1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02099497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Z N×) n−1 generalization of the chiral Potts model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When J = 1 the expression (6.5) further reduces to the trigonometric n-state R-Matrix [29,30]. We shall also use a twisted version of this Rmatrix [31] which we give using notations of [32] …”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When J = 1 the expression (6.5) further reduces to the trigonometric n-state R-Matrix [29,30]. We shall also use a twisted version of this Rmatrix [31] which we give using notations of [32] …”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using (7.15) for general J and (6.5) one can write it in terms of Weil generators (6.21) similar to (6.23) It satisfies the algebra 20) where S 1,2 (λ) is given by (7.1) with I = J = 1. This L-operator was first obtained in [32] in a slightly different form. The root of unity condition q N = 1 used there does not affect the local structure of the algebra (7.20).…”
Section: Stochastic R-matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 are related by (17)). The map (22) contains the quantities k, a, a * , defined in (19), which now become operators. For definiteness, assume that the non-commuting factors in (19) are ordered exactly as written.…”
Section: Tetrahedron Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) there exists a quantum version of the map (22), which acts as an automorphism of the tensor cube of the q-oscillator algebra (53). The formulae (22) for the quantum map stay exactly the same, but the relation (20) should be replaced by either of the two relations on the second line of (53), for instance, k 2 = q (1 − a * a).…”
Section: Tetrahedron Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation