2016
DOI: 10.1353/com.2016.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yusuf’s “Queer” Beauty in Persian Cultural Productions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In images that entail both men and women, women are portrayed in diverse but specific roles such as lovers, subjects and objects of lust, spectators of events, dancers, and musicians (albeit less predominantly than men) (Babaie, 2009; Ghazanfari and Tabatabaii, 2017). Both men and women are eroticized in Safavid paintings (Yaghoobi, 2016), but the depiction of female nudity is not common (Rezaei et al, 2020). Despite their relatively less frequent appearance in paintings, paintings depicting Safavid women are still both abundant and digitally accessible.…”
Section: Safavid Women and Their Place In (Digitized) Paintingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In images that entail both men and women, women are portrayed in diverse but specific roles such as lovers, subjects and objects of lust, spectators of events, dancers, and musicians (albeit less predominantly than men) (Babaie, 2009; Ghazanfari and Tabatabaii, 2017). Both men and women are eroticized in Safavid paintings (Yaghoobi, 2016), but the depiction of female nudity is not common (Rezaei et al, 2020). Despite their relatively less frequent appearance in paintings, paintings depicting Safavid women are still both abundant and digitally accessible.…”
Section: Safavid Women and Their Place In (Digitized) Paintingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This belief, among other cultural grounds, meant that the practice of non-heterosexual relationships was accepted and prevalent during the Safavid period. The eroticization of the male body and homoerotic love were trends in the medieval Islamic period and peaked in popularity in the Safavid era (Yaghoobi 2016). Yaghoobi (2016) analyzed Persian cultural productions, in which homoeroticism is depicted, and argues that these productions could illustrate either master-slave relationships, where slaves were sexually subjected to their masters, or the Sufi practice of Shahidbazi, where younger, beardless, adolescent boys were the object of an adult man's desire.…”
Section: Marriage Concubinage and Motherhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eroticization of the male body and homoerotic love were trends in the medieval Islamic period and peaked in popularity in the Safavid era (Yaghoobi 2016). Yaghoobi (2016) analyzed Persian cultural productions, in which homoeroticism is depicted, and argues that these productions could illustrate either master-slave relationships, where slaves were sexually subjected to their masters, or the Sufi practice of Shahidbazi, where younger, beardless, adolescent boys were the object of an adult man's desire. Shahidbazi practice entailed spiritual, emotional, and sometimes lustful elements (for more on this, see Najmabadi 2005;Zargar 2013).…”
Section: Marriage Concubinage and Motherhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19-29). In the Malay manuscripts, their union is often referred to as the paragon of passion and pleasure, which may also have been inspired by the 15th century Persian poem by 'Abd al-Rahman Jami on the allegorical romance between Yusuf and Zulaikha (Yaghoobi 2016).…”
Section: The Valorisation Of Pleasurementioning
confidence: 99%