1996
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(96)00583-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yukawa system (dusty plasma) in one-dimensional external fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
131
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where is the mean counts in the cell, is directly related tō N the angular correlation function (Peebles 1980) (Totsuji & Kihara 1969;Lahav & Saslaw 1992)…”
Section: N(1 S) P A(s/smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the mean counts in the cell, is directly related tō N the angular correlation function (Peebles 1980) (Totsuji & Kihara 1969;Lahav & Saslaw 1992)…”
Section: N(1 S) P A(s/smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that large scale galaxy structures, of size of the order of several hundreds of Mpc/h 1 , have been observed to be the typical feature of the distribution of visible matter in the local universe, the statistical analysis measuring their properties has identified a characteristic scale which has only slightly changed since its discovery fourthy years ago in angular catalogs. This scale, r 0 , was measured to be the one at which fluctuations in the galaxy density field are about twice the value of the sample density and it was indeed determined to be r 0 ≈ 5 Mpc/h in the Shane and Wirtanen angular catalog [5]. Subsequent measurements of this scale -see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…From the statistical point of view, the problem is whether these structures are compatible with the very small characteristic length scale of the galaxy distribution of about ten Mpc. This is the scale at which the two-point correlation function is equal to unity, and it has been measured to be in the range of 5−15 Mpc/h in different (angular and three-dimensional) catalogs (Totsuji & Kihara 1969;Davis & Peebles 1983;Davis et al 1988;Park et al 1994;Benoist et al 1996;Norberg et al 2001Norberg et al , 2002Zehavi et al 2002Zehavi et al , 2005. The essence of the problem is not whether these measurements have been properly made as indeed they have been, but whether the statistical methods used to get this result are consistent with the properties of the galaxy distribution in these samples (see Gabrielli et al 2005;Sylos Labini et al 2009c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%