2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05176-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link

Abstract: Introduction/objectives The current 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is continuing to spread rapidly despite all efforts. Patients with rheumatic disease may have higher levels of anxiety due to their disease characteristics and medications. The web-based platforms are widely used sources for gaining medical information. YouTube presents a wide range of medical information, but there are concerns on its quality. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the quality of the YouTube videos about COVID-19 and rheumatic disea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
4
72
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the search terms were chosen by the authors on the assumption that a Spanish-speaking user would probably use one of them to perform simple searches on YouTube regarding COVID-19 prevention measures. The number of videos evaluated, although somewhat less than that used by some other authors (142) [ 37 ], is greater than that used in most studies of this type [ 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 17 , 19 , 31 , 34 ], in which less than 114 videos are usually included. In any case, our sample was sufficient to obtain accurate results (with narrow confidence intervals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the search terms were chosen by the authors on the assumption that a Spanish-speaking user would probably use one of them to perform simple searches on YouTube regarding COVID-19 prevention measures. The number of videos evaluated, although somewhat less than that used by some other authors (142) [ 37 ], is greater than that used in most studies of this type [ 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 17 , 19 , 31 , 34 ], in which less than 114 videos are usually included. In any case, our sample was sufficient to obtain accurate results (with narrow confidence intervals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As in similar studies, videos publicly available on YouTube were assessed, and no human participants/animals were included. Therefore, Ethics Committee approval was not required for this study [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JAMA and DISCERN scores were found highest in videos uploaded by the physicians. In studies evaluating YouTube video content on different topics, videos uploaded by physicians, universities, and academic sources were found to be of higher quality and more reliable 24,29 . Also, it has been stated that online FM information sources had low quality and poor readability 8 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The total DISCERN score was calculated by summing up the first 15 questions. 20 It can be categorized as excellent (63-75), good (51-62), fair (39-50), poor (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38), and very poor (<27). 21,22 JAMA benchmark criteria were published in order to evaluate the quality of internet information on health care.…”
Section: Video Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…YouTube offers a variety of graphical materials on most rheumatology topics, exemplified by videos on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and on secukinumab [38,39]. Variable quality videos are increasingly posted in the time of the pandemic [40]. Thus, all such materials require curating by experts.…”
Section: Social Media For Rheumatology Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%