YouTube™ as a source of information on extraction of third molars

Kidy, Sofia; McGoldrick, David; Stockton, Peter

doi:10.1007/s10006-021-00941-3

Cited by 9 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean duration of the oral biopsy videos published on YouTube was similar to that of other procedures, such as genioplasty (Ayranci et al, 2021), leukoplakia , third molar extractions (Kidy et al, 2021), and Sjögren's syndrome (Delli et al, 2016).…”

Section: General Parameters Visibility and Popularitysupporting

confidence: 53%

“…The considerable majority of the videos analyzed in this study were published in India, unlike other studies where the USA was the main exporter (Abukaraky et al, 2018;Kidy et al, 2021;Romano et al, 2021). Those responsible for publishing the information on YouTube were oral health practitioners, coinciding with other previously published studies (Abukaraky et al, 2018;Ceylan Sen et al, 2023;Kodonas & Fardi, 2021;Nason et al, 2016;Romano et al, ); however, there are articles in which independent users and individuals unrelated to dentistry more frequently published content on dental procedures (Ayranci et al, 2021;Morais et al, 2020;Nason et al, 2016;Ramadhani et al, 2021).…”

Section: General Parameters Visibility and Popularitymentioning

confidence: 81%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of the quality of oral biopsy procedure videos shared on YouTube

Díaz‐Rodríguez,

Limeres‐Posse,

Albuquerque

et al. 2023

Oral Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the quality of free‐to‐access videos on oral biopsy procedures on the YouTube platform.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a search on YouTube using the term “oral biopsy” and selected the first 100 videos in order of relevance. The following exclusion criteria were applied: language other than English, videos that did not cover oral biopsy techniques, videos on nonhuman specimens, postoperative instructions, personal experiences, exfoliative cytology, or “brush biopsy.” Forty‐seven selected videos were classified based on their duration, country of origin, date of upload to the system, author, information source and number of views, and likes and dislikes. Video quality was analyzed using DISCERN, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI).ResultsThe majority (78.7%) of analyzed videos were uploaded by dentists, originating from India (48.9%), with a mean duration of 11.8 min (SD, 20.4), with 104.5 likes (SD, 186.4) and 7.1 dislikes (SD, 10.55). The mean values for DISCERN, GQS, and VIQI were 1.3 (SD, 0.52), 2.1 (SD, 1.04), and 9.62 (SD, 1.69), respectively.ConclusionThe majority of videos on oral biopsy published on YouTube are of low quality.

show abstract

Section: General Parameters Visibility and Popularitysupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: General Parameters Visibility and Popularitymentioning

confidence: 81%

Assessment of the quality of oral biopsy procedure videos shared on YouTube

Díaz‐Rodríguez,

Limeres‐Posse,

Albuquerque

et al. 2023

Oral Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This modified, unvalidated version of the DISCERN tool has been extensively used in past research. 19,28,31,[35][36][37] The tool was comprised of five questions which were answered as either 'yes' or 'no' to generate a possible score between 0 and 5, with 0 being unreliable and 5 the most reliable.…”

Section: Discern Reliability Toolmentioning

confidence: 99%

The appeal of ‘Do It Yourself’ orthodontic aligners: A YouTube analysis

Collins

Luc

Karadeniz

et al. 2021

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The present study aimed to determine how the popularity of ‘Do It Yourself’ (DIY) aligner videos available on YouTube relates to authorship, video content, quality and reliability, and to determine why DIY aligners appeal to consumers. Methods: The Google Trends website was interrogated to identify the most frequently used search terms regarding DIY aligners which were subsequently applied to a search of the YouTube website. One hundred twenty-three videos were assessed for completeness of content, reliability (using a modified version of the DISCERN tool) and quality using the Global Quality Score (GQS). The relationship between the variables and authorship, popularity, financial interest, and recommendations were assessed using Pearson Correlation Coefficients. Results: Laypeople produced the majority of the videos (73%). Dentists/Orthodontists uploaded only 4% of the videos, and dental professional bodies uploaded none. Most videos (86%) were content poor, unreliable (average DISCERN score of 1) and of low quality (average GQS of 2). The more popular, reliable and superior the quality of the video, the greater the number of views, likes and viewing rate (p < 0.05). Conversely, authors with a financial interest and lower quality and less reliable videos were more likely to recommend DIY aligners. Consumers sought DIY aligner treatment due to a reduced cost. Conclusions: YouTube should not be considered as a viable nor reliable source of DIY aligner information for patients or the public. Dentists/Orthodontists should be encouraged to publish comprehensive and more informative YouTube content related to DIY aligners.

show abstract

“…23,24 Güncel literatür incelendiğinde; ağız, diş ve çene cerrahisi alanında dental implantlar, baş ve boyun kanserleri, gömülü diş çekimleri, ortognatik cerrahi gibi konularda hazırlanan internet içeriklerinin incelendiğini görülmektedir. 7,19,25 Benzer şekilde ortopedi, nöroloji ve romatoloji gibi diğer tıp branşlarında hazırlanan videolar bulunsa da çalışmalar, mevcut videoların bilgi içeriklerinin zayıf olduğu konusunda görüş bildirmektedir. 15,26 Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre en fazla izlenen, yorumlanan ve beğeni alan videolar hastalar tarafından yüklenen videolar olmuştur.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Analysis of the Informational Content of Turkish YouTubeTM Videos on Orthognatic Surgery: Cross-Sectional Evaluation

ERDİL¹,

DEMİRSOY²,

ÇOLAK³

2022

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ortognatik cerrahi birçok dentofasiyal deformitenin tedavisinde sıklıkla başvurulan bir operasyondur. Hastalardan aydınlatılmış onamlar alabilmek, tedavi sonucunda hastaların beklentilerini anlayabil-mek ve olası tatminsizliklerle başa çıkabilmek için hastalara uygulanacak tedavi ile ilgili detaylı bilgiler verilmelidir. [1][2][3] Literatürde, hasta memnuniyetinin tedavi öncesi verilen bilgiler ve kısmen de cerrahi ile

show abstract

YouTube™ as a source of information on extraction of third molars

Cited by 9 publications

References 22 publications

Assessment of the quality of oral biopsy procedure videos shared on YouTube

Assessment of the quality of oral biopsy procedure videos shared on YouTube

The appeal of ‘Do It Yourself’ orthodontic aligners: A YouTube analysis

Analysis of the Informational Content of Turkish YouTubeTM Videos on Orthognatic Surgery: Cross-Sectional Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About