2021
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YouTube™ and oral lichen planus: an appraisal of the educational quality of information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, there are studies that analyze the quality and viewing data of videos about various lesions in the oral region uploaded to YouTube. Some of these are about oral leukoplakia (Kovalski et al, 2019), oral cancers and precancerous lesions (Gulve et al, 2022), and lichen lesions (Morais et al, 2020; Romano et al, 2021), but as far as we noticed as a result of the literature review, this is the first study analyzing the videos uploaded to YouTube about oral candida lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, there are studies that analyze the quality and viewing data of videos about various lesions in the oral region uploaded to YouTube. Some of these are about oral leukoplakia (Kovalski et al, 2019), oral cancers and precancerous lesions (Gulve et al, 2022), and lichen lesions (Morais et al, 2020; Romano et al, 2021), but as far as we noticed as a result of the literature review, this is the first study analyzing the videos uploaded to YouTube about oral candida lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In recent times, several studies have assessed the quality of YouTube™ videos on various health topics, like Sjögren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, anorexia, burning mouth syndrome, oral lichen planus, leukoplakia, oral cancer, and Alzheimer's disease (Delli et al, 2016; Fortuna et al, 2019; Hassona et al, 2016; Kovalski et al, 2019; Morais et al, 2020; Singh et al, 2012; Syed‐Abdul et al, 2013; Tang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral diseases represent high-trend topics for users, so that a Youtube TM query returns a large number of inherent items; nevertheless, visibility and popularity never match with valuable information [33]. The qualitative assessment of the video content is not widely homogeneous in the use of the interpretative tools: the majority of studies applied more than one tool, the most utilized ones being DISCERN [30,32,36,38] and usefulness score [30,31,35,37,39] (5 studies out of 10). Website scientific content evaluation still remains a demanding task; however, despite the assessment heterogeneity, the overall evaluation of the content quality of results is really poor, such that all included studies suggest implementation of scientific content or accurate reviews by experts in the field [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic review aimed to summarize and highlight major web-disseminated oral health content retrieved on the Youtube TM platform. Healthcare professionals should protect this knowledge and manage all the necessary instruments to improve web-based dissemination, in order to properly address patients' issues about diagnosis and therapeutical pathways [35]. The main study limitations seem to be the disagreements in data extraction based on the different parameters used to analyze the content, and the unsuitability of a huge amount of non-English language video content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation