Youth, Violence and Conflict Transformation

McEvoy-Levy, Siobhán

doi:10.1080/10402650120038198

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As in the case of youth in conflict, it is in the structure that exploitation (Gillard, 2001; Mcintyre & Thusi, 2003) and infantilisation (Hilker & Fraser, 2009) of agency happens. This is happening despite the increasing studies on the capacity of youth to be peacebuilders (Ardizzone, 2003; Arnold, 2009; Bennett et al, 2012; Del Felice & Solheim, 2011; McEvoy-Levy, 2001; Theis, 2006). Especially in fragile states, “intergenerational power dynamics” hinders youth agency in peacebuilding, especially at the local level.…”

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whilst they are underfunded, youth-led peacebuilding initiatives exist. Yet, their contribution is hardly recognised and is less visible to the ruling elites (McEvoy-Levy, 2001). Since the organisations are small and not hierarchical, there is more freedom to voice their feelings and initiate ways to contribute positively to society (Del Felice & Solheim, 2011).…”

Section: Youth In Conflictmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since the organisations are small and not hierarchical, there is more freedom to voice their feelings and initiate ways to contribute positively to society (Del Felice & Solheim, 2011). However, often their effectiveness is hard to measure (McEvoy-Levy, 2001; Smith Ellison & Smith, 2012). In a study by Theis (2006), young peacebuilders are often those who experienced first-hand struggle and choose to bring opportunities to their fellow youth affected with conflict.…”

Section: Youth In Conflictmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Social media and other structural elements surrounding youth that can address violence and advance their peacebuilding agency. Levy, 2001;Theis, 2006). Especially in fragile states, "intergenerational power dynamics" hinders youth agency in peacebuilding, especially at the local level.…”

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Social Media and Youth Peacebuilding Agency: A Case From Muslim Mindanao

Ragandang

2020

Journal of Peacebuilding & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article determines how social media, along with institutional affiliation and first-hand experiences of violence, influence youth peacebuilding agency. It utilises the case of a group of university students from Muslim Mindanao in the Philippines who implemented a project that aimed to counter Islamophobia-linked hate speech online. Interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation were employed during fieldwork. The main argument is that the youth peacebuilding agency does not necessarily rest upon traditional peacebuilding structures. Rather, it lays in structural elements familiar to the youth. Access and familiarity of the youths to social media led them to use it as the platform of the project. The conceptualisation of the project was influenced by their first-hand experience of violence and Mindanao conflict. As university students, their institutional affiliation with the academia had supplemented in meeting the resources they needed. Time constraints and family relationships posed a challenge amongst the youth. The empirical findings of this research hope to contribute to studies on youth agency, peacebuilding, and development in post-conflict contexts.

show abstract

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Youth In Conflictmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Youth In Conflictmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Social Media and Youth Peacebuilding Agency: A Case From Muslim Mindanao

Ragandang

2020

Journal of Peacebuilding & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Schools and their curricula are integrally related to these goals because they encompass official discourses about the nation, democracy, rights, and history (Davies, 2003). Furthermore, youth can be influential actors, whether as agents for change, stability, disillusionment, renewed conflict, or social justice (Bekerman et al, 2009; McEvoy-Levy, 2001; Schwartz, 2010).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%