2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youth offender reentry: Models for intervention and directions for future inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such support could be critical, and potentially protect against erosion of effects typically observed following participation in residential programs (e.g., Barker 1988). Studies describing the process of reentry into communities following incarceration emphasize the key roles of neighborhood context (Abrams and Snyder 2010), social support (Laub and Sampson 2001), and informal mentoring (Todis et al 2001) in discouraging recidivism and fostering successful reentry.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such support could be critical, and potentially protect against erosion of effects typically observed following participation in residential programs (e.g., Barker 1988). Studies describing the process of reentry into communities following incarceration emphasize the key roles of neighborhood context (Abrams and Snyder 2010), social support (Laub and Sampson 2001), and informal mentoring (Todis et al 2001) in discouraging recidivism and fostering successful reentry.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, multilevel contextual factors may have an even stronger effect for such a disadvantaged group as returning prisoners and ex-offenders (Abrams & Snyder, 2010;Kubrin & Stewart, 2006;Mears, Wang, Hay, & Bales, 2008;Reisig, Bales, Hay, & Wang, 2007). Mennis and colleagues (2011) examined collective efficacy and socioeconomic measures on juvenile delinquency and recidivism, finding violent crime and poverty the most influential predictors of both.…”
Section: Context and Reoffendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can include individual therapeutic interventions, family interventions, and mentoring programs, all of which are designed to address barriers to successful reentry (Spencer & Jones-Walker, 2004). Most of these programs are individually focused, in that they seek to reduce the young person's risk factors and build upon protective factors to prevent reoffending (Abrams & Snyder, 2010).…”
Section: Reentry Program Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%