Youth, Dirt, and the Spatialization of Subjectivity: An Intersectional Approach to White Rural Imaginaries

Abstract

Canada's rural idyll is embedded within the colonial legacy of a white settler society; however, little research has examined how class and gender uphold this articulation of rurality and whiteness. This article draws on ethnographic research with white, working-class rural youth to develop an intersectional analysis of rural imaginaries. The analysis shows how youth construct their own rural identities through racialized representations of urban and global "others." I argue that these racist place-narratives must be understood in the context of competing discourses of rurality in Canada: the romanticized pure white rural of colonial history, and the pathologized poor white rural of a cosmopolitan future. Even as youth locate their gendered performances within the rural idyll, they are marked as "dirts" by their classed, rural status. By inscribing racist discourses onto others, youth resist the classist imagery projected onto their community and thereby reclaim a pure white rural idyll.

Future Directions in Research and Intervention with Youths in Poverty

“…In the case of poverty in the US, there is a dearth of research on rural populations (Gurley, 2016) and working-class culture as an identity resource, especially for White youths. Cairn’s (2013) ethnographic study of how race, place, gender and class intersect in shaping rural youth’s subjectivity demonstrates how intersectionality-informed research can help fill this gap. Research on the buffering potential of youths’ intersecting identities will likely benefit from attending to qualitative research on working class culture and identity such as Beider, Harwood, and Chahal’s (2017) important fieldwork.…”

Habitat Maintenance and Local Economic Ethics in Rural Atlantic Canada

“…Further, there is good reason not to romanticize or relativize all rural attitudes; as has become increasingly clear with the resurgence of fascism and xenophobia across North America and Europe—much of it associated with rural society (cf. Cairns )—there are some ethics structuring rural worldviews and behaviors that are destructive. In fact, exclusion and intolerance may well be the other edge of the same local‐first, self‐reliant ethics described in this paper.…”

Race, privilege and the exclusivity of farm internships: Ecological agricultural education and the implications for food movements

“…According to Slocum (2011), agricultural landscapes are ‘made through racial ideologies active in the labour market and the institutionalized racism that removed African-Americans, Mexican and Indigenous people from the land’ (312). There have also been many reports of discrimination through rural racism (Cairns, 2013; Chakraborti and Garland, 2004) and accounts of systemic injustice against racialized farmworkers across North America (Holmes, 2013; Weiler et al., 2016).…”