2018
DOI: 10.2196/mental.9041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youth Codesign of a Mobile Phone App to Facilitate Self-Monitoring and Management of Mood Symptoms in Young People With Major Depression, Suicidal Ideation, and Self-Harm

Abstract: BackgroundEffective treatment of depression in young people is critical, given its prevalence, impacts, and link to suicide. Clinical practice guidelines point to the need for regular monitoring of depression symptom severity and the emergence of suicidal ideation to track treatment progress and guide intervention delivery. Yet, this is seldom integrated in clinical practice.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to address the gap between guidelines about monitoring and real-world practice by codesigning an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
141
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
13
141
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study provided an opportunity to explore key features of a successful e-platform for monitoring mental health and wellbeing within a school setting for young people 16+. Findings support some existing literature, highlighting the importance of design and customisation on e-platform uptake and retention (31), and provides novel insight into young people's expectations and preferences for digital health. Very few studies have reported the process of co-design with young people in wellbeing digital technologies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study provided an opportunity to explore key features of a successful e-platform for monitoring mental health and wellbeing within a school setting for young people 16+. Findings support some existing literature, highlighting the importance of design and customisation on e-platform uptake and retention (31), and provides novel insight into young people's expectations and preferences for digital health. Very few studies have reported the process of co-design with young people in wellbeing digital technologies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…While forms of PPI are increasingly prevalent in health research, there are concerns that the power dynamic between 'research community' and 'public' limits the impact of meaningful and effective collaboration (29). To address such concerns, previous adolescent e-health research has employed a collaborative co-design approach with young people throughout web-development processes (30,31). There are various roles a young person can occupy in a co-design collaboration, including a user, tester, informant or design partner (32).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available frameworks [ 51 ] and findings from co-design research in adolescent mental health and primary care can guide the development of digital health interventions to address effective engagement with adolescent obesity prevention and management interventions. Two recent Australian research studies have described a co-design process to develop apps to improve young people’s experience of seeing their general practitioner [ 54 ] and for self-monitoring and management mood symptoms in adolescents with depression [ 55 ]. A similarity of both studies throughout the co-design process was the identification of contrasting needs, motivations and intentions for the apps between researchers, clinicians, and adolescents [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Three Strategies For Effective Engagement With Digital Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with clinicians' hypothetical views [40,57,58], most participants were happy with a clinician having automatic access to their responses. The absence of difficulties while using ExPRESS, which automatically uploads data to the researcher, may have allayed concerns about automatic uploads in our sample.…”
Section: Principal Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%