Youth and social media: the affordances and challenges of online graffiti practice

Abstract

The impact of social media use on youth subcultures, such as graffiti writers, has been rapid and dramatic, bringing with it a number of significant transformations that present both opportunities and challenges. This paper explores the impact of the Internet and social media on a community of graffiti practitioners. I argue that the rise and uptake of online social networking platforms such as Instagram and You Tube have offered a range of affordances to the practice of graffiti writing. These affordances include: greater accessibility to graffiti culture; learning opportunities; and opportunities for wider distribution and curation of graffiti pieces. Simultaneously, social media challenges the significance of ‘community’, that is, the physical social interaction afforded by participation in real world graffiti crews. The findings suggest that while there are tangible benefits from the use of the Internet and uptake of social media by the graffiti writing community, it is the physical communal bonds experienced within a graffiti crew that are vital to the wellbeing and continuity of the culture. This paper contributes to our understanding of how social media affects youth more broadly and specifically how social media platforms are transforming the experience of youth subcultural practice.

TikTok and Transparency Obligations in the EU Digital Services Act (DSA) – A Scoping Review

“…First, machine learning algorithms determine which forms of content go against the rules. 49 Second, flagging "allows other users to mark your content as inappropriate". 50 Upon the flagging of content, an initial review is conducted to ascertain whether said content indeed contravenes TikTok's community guidelines.…”

Spray without politics? Contrasting street-based perceptions and computer vision framings of graffitied Rome

“…Whenever vernacular creativity can exist on its own or with new media spaces, there are always limitations and drawbacks to how the public justifies these interventions’ existence (Burgess, 2006, Iveson, 2011). On social media, city controversies around the illicit nature of graffiti can conveniently be ignored by digital viewers, as the material conditions of the production run absent while all it matters is its digital circulation (Bowen, 2013; Baird, 2022).…”

Comparing shades of darkness: trolling victims’ experiences on social media vs. online gaming

“…Back then, games and social media were not so different; these all consisted of people communicating with one another through text shared via cyberspace. Over time, however, social media and gaming began to differentiate themselves from one another and develop their own unique subcultures as they developed new affordances and mechanics (e.g., Baird, 2022 ; Mitchell-Church and Thambusamy, 2022 ). Today, few people would confuse Fortnite and Facebook, for instance, but both share the good and bad communication that their Usenet and AOL forebears once did (e.g., Hannan, 2018 ; Hilvert-Bruce and Neill, 2020 ).…”