‘Your country needs you’: the ethics of allocating staff to high-risk clinical roles in the management of patients with COVID-19

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic impacts on health service delivery, health providers are modifying care pathways and staffing models in ways that require health professionals to be reallocated to work in critical care settings. Many of the roles that staff are being allocated to in the intensive care unit and emergency department pose additional risks to themselves, and new policies for staff reallocation are causing distress and uncertainty to the professionals concerned. In this paper, we analyse a range of ethical issues associated with changes to staff allocation processes in the face of COVID-19. In line with a dominant view in the medical ethics literature, we claim, first, that no individual health professional has a specific, positive obligation to treat a patient when doing so places that professional at risk of harm, and so there is a clear ethical tension in any reallocation process in this context. Next, we argue that the changing asymmetries of health needs in hospitals means that careful consideration needs to be given to a stepwise process for deallocating staff from their usual duties. We conclude by considering how a justifiable process of reallocating professionals to highrisk clinical roles should be configured once those who are 'fit for reallocation' have been identified. We claim that this process needs to attend to three questions that we consider in detail: (1) how the choice to make reallocation decisions is made, (2) what justifiable models for reallocation might look like and (3) what is owed to those who are reallocated.on June 9, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.

Balancing health worker well-being and duty to care: an ethical approach to staff safety in COVID-19 and beyond

“…Finally, the COVID-19 situation is different to previous infectious disease outbreaks given the scale of the pandemic which in some countries has required large-scale reallocation of staff to other roles. 13…”

Cardiac Surgery-Enhanced Recovery Programs Modified for COVID-19: Key Steps to Preserve Resources, Manage Caseload Backlog, and Improve Patient Outcomes

“…Cardiac surgical programs are still learning, in real time, how to triage cases optimally, screen patients for SARS-CoV-2, allocate personal protective equipment safely yet judiciously, and balance the ethical dilemmas of these choices. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Members of the healthcare team are working harder, longer, with less autonomy, and in more stressful situations than before, with detrimental effects on mental health and quality of life. 27 , 28 , 29 …”

Ethical conflicts in COVID-19 times

“…The ethical conflict is aggravated when the doctor's responsibility is questioned regarding whether a patient should be treated or not. The key question here is whether a health professional's "obligation to treat" is sufficient to support a requirement to fulfill their duty which may represent a high risk of infection or death [11]. Would there be a sanction for the health professional refusing to treat a patient when biosecurity conditions do not exist?…”