2018
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1441423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Younger and older adults’ associative memory for medication interactions of varying severity

Abstract: While older adults face various deficits in binding items in memory, they are often able to remember information that is deemed important. In Experiment 1, we examined how younger and older adults remember medication interactions of varying severity. There were no age differences in overall memory accuracy, but older adults' performance depended on the severity of the interactions (such that the interactions associated with the most severe health outcomes were remembered most accurately) while younger adults' … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such selectivity is emphasized by participants' study decisions in Experiment 2, with higher magnitudes receiving more study visits (and thus more total study time) despite equivalent study time per visit with lower magnitudes. As such, these results add further evidence that participants are effective in prioritizing important information, consistent with a large body of work demonstrating preserved selectivity with various materials like unrelated word pairs (Ariel et al, 2015), name-face pairs (Hargis & Castel, 2017), medication side effects (Hargis & Castel, 2018), and item-location pairs (Siegel & Castel, 2018b), and under varying degrees of cognitive ability, like healthy aging (Castel et al, 2002;Hayes et al, 2013;Siegel & Castel, 2018a), Alzheimer's disease (Castel et al, 2009), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (Castel et al, 2011), and different working memory capacities (Griffin, Benjamin, Sahakyan, & Stanley, 2019;Middlebrooks et al, 2017;Miller, Gross, & Unsworth, 2019;Robison & Unsworth, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Such selectivity is emphasized by participants' study decisions in Experiment 2, with higher magnitudes receiving more study visits (and thus more total study time) despite equivalent study time per visit with lower magnitudes. As such, these results add further evidence that participants are effective in prioritizing important information, consistent with a large body of work demonstrating preserved selectivity with various materials like unrelated word pairs (Ariel et al, 2015), name-face pairs (Hargis & Castel, 2017), medication side effects (Hargis & Castel, 2018), and item-location pairs (Siegel & Castel, 2018b), and under varying degrees of cognitive ability, like healthy aging (Castel et al, 2002;Hayes et al, 2013;Siegel & Castel, 2018a), Alzheimer's disease (Castel et al, 2009), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (Castel et al, 2011), and different working memory capacities (Griffin, Benjamin, Sahakyan, & Stanley, 2019;Middlebrooks et al, 2017;Miller, Gross, & Unsworth, 2019;Robison & Unsworth, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This awareness of how much/often one forgets may lead to older adults to engage in responsible remembering. For example, when remembering allergy information or information about medications, older adults may be responsible in remembering by focusing only on what is most critical, perhaps to compensate for declines in memory (Friedman et al, 2015; Hargis & Castel, 2018; Middlebrooks et al, 2016). With increased task experience, older adults may engage in responsible remembering by systematically shifting their attention toward items of importance and also updating this information.…”
Section: Judgments Of Learning and Failures Of Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants often fail to appreciate how much interference can detrimentally affect performance (Diaz & Benjamin, 2011), but interference often occurs in real-world medical situations (e.g., when a new medication can cause headaches as a side effect, while a previous medication was associated with dizziness; see Hargis & Castel, 2018b).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%