2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.14379
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young stellar distance indicators and the extragalactic distance scale

Abstract: The extragalactic distance scale is perhaps the most important application of stellar distance indicators. Among these, classical Cepheids are high-accuracy standard candles that support a 1.4% measurement of Hubble's constant, H 0 . The accuracy of Cepheid distances is thus directly relevant for understanding the implications of the Hubble tension, the > 5σ discord among direct, late-Universe H 0 measurements and H 0 values inferred from the early Universe observations assuming ΛCDM cosmology. This invited re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, this unsupervised method in its current form, is susceptible to mistaking the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) for the RGB (e.g., NGC 4038), a problem that is known and has been addressed by many authors previously in the literature [55][56][57]. For NGC 4038 and NGC 4536, the TRGB distances that their unsupervised algorithm gives the highest weight to (having higher contrast values) are significantly closer than the published SHoES Cepheid distance measurements [9] by 0.7 and 0.6 mag, that is 30% and 40% offsets in distance, respectively, and ultimately contribute a higher H 0 value than other measurements based on the TRGB [10][11][12][13]. These results also differ appreciably from the excellent agreement between the published Cepheid distances in Riess et al [9] and TRGB JCAP11(2023)050 distances in Freedman et al [27], which in the mean, agree to 0.007 mag.…”
Section: Remaining Challenges In Measuring the Trgbmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, this unsupervised method in its current form, is susceptible to mistaking the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) for the RGB (e.g., NGC 4038), a problem that is known and has been addressed by many authors previously in the literature [55][56][57]. For NGC 4038 and NGC 4536, the TRGB distances that their unsupervised algorithm gives the highest weight to (having higher contrast values) are significantly closer than the published SHoES Cepheid distance measurements [9] by 0.7 and 0.6 mag, that is 30% and 40% offsets in distance, respectively, and ultimately contribute a higher H 0 value than other measurements based on the TRGB [10][11][12][13]. These results also differ appreciably from the excellent agreement between the published Cepheid distances in Riess et al [9] and TRGB JCAP11(2023)050 distances in Freedman et al [27], which in the mean, agree to 0.007 mag.…”
Section: Remaining Challenges In Measuring the Trgbmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The SHoES program [9,13] has the goal of using HST/ACS and HST/WFC3 to extend and improve the Cepheid calibration of SNe Ia for a measurement of H 0 . Most recently, they have obtained NIR observations of Cepheids in 42 SN Ia host galaxies (figure 2) with the aim of reducing the systematic uncertainties due to reddening and metallicity.…”
Section: Supernova Ho For the Equation Of State (Shoes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation