Young people’s voices: disciplining young people’s participation in decision-making in special educational needs

Abstract

In recent years, education and family policy in the UK has sought to incorporate the views of children and young people through an active participation agenda, in the fulfilment of children's rights under the obligations of the UN Convention for the Rights of the Child. Drawing on empirical evidence, this paper suggests that this aspiration is flawed. The inclusion of young people's voices in decision-making is context dependent, and influenced by individual relationships, both positive and negative. It is framed by policies that subjugate children within disciplinary technologies that determine a regime of 'truth' about effective and appropriate participation. Drawing on data gathered as part of a wider study on the relationships between services users and services providers in special educational needs, this paper demonstrates that active inclusion of the voice of the child can be illustrated to be at least variable, and at worst prejudiced. It is suggested that the notion of participation produces tacit forms of 'government' that further classify and divide young people, magnifying their marginalization.

Building a Collaborative Relationship With an Involuntary Parent in Child Protective Services

“…Taking this into account and focusing on the aim of social work throughout the process enables a more conscious way of working with involuntary parents, while not putting the responsibility of building collaboration entirely on their shoulders. This view of power is not static or one-directional (Bronfenbrenner, 1979;McKay, 2014). Healy (1998) considers the importance of Foucault's outlook on power to remind professionals not to see themselves as powerful and clients as powerless, but to think in terms of multiple relations of power, thereby understanding power as a relational concept.…”

Shifting research methods with a becoming-child ontology: Co-theorising puppet production with high school students

“…Power relations in researcher situations ‘eliciting’ children’s ‘voices’ have also been a concern in Childhood Studies and the student voice literature. Childhood scholars have discussed power relations between adults and children (Alderson and Morrow, 2004; Holland et al, 2008), power relations between children (Lomax, 2012; Schäfer and Yarwood, 2008) and the potential for adults to politically manage participants’ voices (Komulainen, 2007; McKay, 2014). Student voice researchers have also explored the complexity of power in teacher/student relations in student voice initiatives (Fielding, 2004; Taylor and Robinson, 2009) and have warned of the potential for student participation to be co-opted by adults (Bragg, 2007; (Kehoe, 2013).…”