2020
DOI: 10.2196/17570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young People’s Experience of a Long-Term Social Media–Based Intervention for First-Episode Psychosis: Qualitative Analysis

Abstract: Background Digital mental health interventions present a unique opportunity to address the lack of social connection and loneliness experienced by young people with first-episode psychosis (FEP). The first generation of digital interventions, however, is associated with high attrition rates. Social media presents an opportunity to target this issue. A new generation of digital intervention has harnessed the popularity of social media to both promote engagement and foster social connectedness in you… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that Affinity was perceived to be supportive and safe and that participants valued being surrounded by others with similar experiences aligns with the quantitative results we have reported elsewhere supporting the acceptability and safety of Affinity [27]. The importance of mutual experiences has also been identified as a theme in other studies using the MOST platform [33,34] and the literature on online support groups for suicidal people [35,36]. The positive impact of providing support to others was also raised by some participants and has been identified in the broader online support group literature [36], although it is acknowledged that 2 participants in this study also reported negative aspects of supporting others, which are important and worthy of further exploration.…”
Section: Positive Appraisals Of the Affinity Social Networksupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that Affinity was perceived to be supportive and safe and that participants valued being surrounded by others with similar experiences aligns with the quantitative results we have reported elsewhere supporting the acceptability and safety of Affinity [27]. The importance of mutual experiences has also been identified as a theme in other studies using the MOST platform [33,34] and the literature on online support groups for suicidal people [35,36]. The positive impact of providing support to others was also raised by some participants and has been identified in the broader online support group literature [36], although it is acknowledged that 2 participants in this study also reported negative aspects of supporting others, which are important and worthy of further exploration.…”
Section: Positive Appraisals Of the Affinity Social Networksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, some participants reported experiencing these benefits just by reading other users' posts, suggesting that the positive impact of mutual experiences may occur even without active participation. The ability of participants to experience therapeutic benefit from passively participating in web-based peer support networks has also been found in previous studies using the MOST model [33,38] and in studies of online health-related support groups more broadly [39,40].…”
Section: Positive Appraisals Of the Affinity Social Networksupporting
confidence: 63%
“…With the majority of young people now using the internet, social media, and mobile devices, the use of technology is an important avenue for supporting recovery in young people experiencing FEP. Research on the use of technology to deliver psychosocial interventions is emerging within the field of early intervention for psychosis [ 24 - 27 ]; however, less attention has been given to how digital health innovations can be adapted across settings. Our study addresses this gap and contributes to the growing field of implementing digital health innovations within the context of mental health service delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, however, uptake of and engagement with digital mental health interventions are low, and attrition rates for mental health interventions, in general, are high [ 13 , 17 ]. Furthermore, most online interventions are focused on initial or short-term engagement, and little is known about maintaining long-term engagement [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%