2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4039-1458-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young Masculinities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
160
0
55

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
160
0
55
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence dominant re-presentations of black pupils as underachievers and as anti-education may severely limit their educational opportunities. This echoes similar accounts in other research into black pupils' experiences at school (e.g., Frosh, Phoenix, and Pattman, 2001;Sarup, 1986). Davis and Williams, for example, have argued that:…”
Section: The Role Of Re-presentation In the Othering Of Social Groupssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hence dominant re-presentations of black pupils as underachievers and as anti-education may severely limit their educational opportunities. This echoes similar accounts in other research into black pupils' experiences at school (e.g., Frosh, Phoenix, and Pattman, 2001;Sarup, 1986). Davis and Williams, for example, have argued that:…”
Section: The Role Of Re-presentation In the Othering Of Social Groupssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Some men will enjoy more access to power and influence than others" (p. 262). Pollack (1998) and Frosh, Phoenix & Pattman (2002) agree that this masculinity is learned at an early age, often in terms of social popularity, and that young boys are taught to value toughness, contention of authority on the one hand and learning, sporting ability, and fashion on the other. Pollack (1998) establishes a 'Boy Code', which is based on Brannon's (1976) four rules of masculinity and, akin to Kimmel's (2008) Guy Code, encourages emotional detachment and silence.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young men are well aware of this splitting of public and private masculinities and able to mobilise a variety of repertoires of meanings and practices in the ways that they enact and talk about intimacy in order to handle and negotiate the tensions between them (Frosh, Phoenix & Pattman, 2002;Wight, 1994;Wight & Henderson, 2004). They may, for example, understand relationships which are primarily organised around sexual pursuit and conquest in terms of the 'public truth' about male interest in sex and female interest in love and those which focus on feelings as romantic (Redman, 2002).…”
Section: Relationships Gender and Identity Workmentioning
confidence: 99%