2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young-elderly differences in bone density, geometry and strength indices depend on proximal femur sub-region: A cross sectional study in Caucasian-American women

Abstract: Fragility fractures at the trochanter (TR) and the femoral neck (FN) have distinct etiologies, but the underlying age-related structural changes at these proximal femoral sub-regions are poorly understood. 28 young (41 ± 3 years) and 124 elderly (74 ± 3 years) healthy Caucasian women underwent volumetric quantitative computed tomography at the hip. Integral (i), cortical (c) and trabecular (t) bone mineral density and content (BMD, BMC) were measured. Geometric parameters included cross sectional area (CSA), a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) is consistent with previous reports (3,6,17). In theory, larger femoral neck cross-sectional area is thought to be a compensatory change to offset age-related bone loss (10) and should be protective against fracture (9,18). However, larger cross-sectional area of the femoral neck also has been associated with lower BMD (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) is consistent with previous reports (3,6,17). In theory, larger femoral neck cross-sectional area is thought to be a compensatory change to offset age-related bone loss (10) and should be protective against fracture (9,18). However, larger cross-sectional area of the femoral neck also has been associated with lower BMD (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recently reviewed by Keaveny and Bouxsein, (31) high-resolution clinical whole body CT scanning of the hip combined with FEA suggests that many candidates for hip fracture might initiate their fracture through localized compressive overload in the cortex as suggested by Carpenter et al (14) and others. (32)(33)(34) When the load on trabeculae in the fall configuration was studied ex vivo with greatly improved resolution using microfinite element analysis by Verhulp et al, (35) the osteoporotic femur also seemed to bear most of its compressive load in the superior cortex. By providing a plausible explanation for an alternative form of local structural failure, caused by elastic instability of this highly loaded cortex, our study highlights the potentially great mechanical importance of femoral neck trabecular bone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existence of regional differences of the trabecular parameters at different skeletal sites (Hui et al, 1988;Hildebrand et al, 1999), and regional degradation that may lead to it (Li et al, 2009), were established. Within the proximal femur, trabecular parameters were found to differ among the femoral head inferior to the fovea, superior to the fovea, adjacent to the femoral neck in the lateral aspect of the femoral head and trochanteric region through MRI, CT and microCT and to be correlated with local BMD (Issever et al, 2002;Meta et al, 2006;Sell et al, 2005). Correlation between ultrasonic parameters and BMD by CT was established (Jenson et al, 2006), as well as a relation between quantitative ultrasound results on bone and fracture risk (Marín et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%