2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young consumers’ purchase behaviour of sustainably-labelled food products. What is the role of scepticism?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…H 5 inferred that green behavior intentions could impact the preference for ecological products. The results (β = 0.48; Z-value = 11.001; p = 0.000) display a strong and significant positive link between these two constructs, thus agreeing with the results of [53] in the case of the food industry and with the conclusion of [54], which is relevant for the textile industry. Thus, H 5 is supported by empirical data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…H 5 inferred that green behavior intentions could impact the preference for ecological products. The results (β = 0.48; Z-value = 11.001; p = 0.000) display a strong and significant positive link between these two constructs, thus agreeing with the results of [53] in the case of the food industry and with the conclusion of [54], which is relevant for the textile industry. Thus, H 5 is supported by empirical data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, external factors can influence recovery and recycling intentions [12,61], green behavior intentions [36,40] and product features [50] according to hypotheses H 10 and H 11 . Green behavior intentions can influence the preference for long-lasting products [39][40][41] and ecological products [53,54], but also the recovery and recycling intentions [61], pinpointed through hypotheses H 2 , H 5 , and H 9 . Hypothesis H 7 highlights a strong relationship between the desire to recover/recycle and the preference for ecological products [48,57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For organic food, risks connected with purchasing organic food are suggested to signify a principal factor inhibiting their acquisition and consumption (Tandon et al, 2020;Kushwah et al, 2019a). Such risk may related to a lack of trust in stakeholders, including manufacturers, farmers and retail stores (Carfora et al, 2019;Guell et al, 2022;Li et al, 2023), skepticism toward sustainability labels (Rossi and Rivetti, 2023), doubt regarding certifications (Miftari et al, 2022;Haider et al, 2022), compounds the apprehensions for consumers. Further, Kushwah et al (2019a) witnessed that sustainable products such as organic food have a low acceptance rate due to financial risk and the trust issue associated with it.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This skepticism can undermine trust in sustainable marketing efforts, making it difficult for genuine sustainable products to gain market traction. Additionally, there is a varying level of awareness and understanding of sustainability issues among consumers, which can affect their willingness to pay a premium for sustainable products or to change their consumption habits [136][137][138] .…”
Section: Sustainability and Marketing In The Energy Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%