2021
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1906361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young chinese children's remote peer interactions and social competence development during the COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, given that children’s physical interactions with peers were restricted due to school closure and social distancing (e.g., Fegert et al, 2020 ; The Government of Hong Kong special Administrative Region Press Releases, 2020 ), some of the items of prosocial behavior subscale of SDQ (Goodman, 1997 ) might not be applicable to the present findings. Although the findings involving the original vs. the shortened prosocial behavior subscale were similar, further studies should examine children’s prosocial behavior in diverse contexts, such as remote interactions with peers (e.g., remote play and online chat with peers; Luo et al, 2022 ) and physical interactions between siblings and other family members at home. Fourth, in this study we did not measure other types of stress, such as financial stress and mothers’ pre-existing parenting stress, as control variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, given that children’s physical interactions with peers were restricted due to school closure and social distancing (e.g., Fegert et al, 2020 ; The Government of Hong Kong special Administrative Region Press Releases, 2020 ), some of the items of prosocial behavior subscale of SDQ (Goodman, 1997 ) might not be applicable to the present findings. Although the findings involving the original vs. the shortened prosocial behavior subscale were similar, further studies should examine children’s prosocial behavior in diverse contexts, such as remote interactions with peers (e.g., remote play and online chat with peers; Luo et al, 2022 ) and physical interactions between siblings and other family members at home. Fourth, in this study we did not measure other types of stress, such as financial stress and mothers’ pre-existing parenting stress, as control variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although the findings involving the original vs. the shortened prosocial behavior subscale were similar, further studies should examine children's prosocial behavior in diverse contexts, such as remote interactions with peers (e.g., remote play and online chat with peers; Luo et al, 2022) and physical interactions between siblings and other family members at home. Fourth, in this study we did not measure other types of stress, such as financial stress and mothers' pre-existing parenting stress, as control variables.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…IoT and social media allow children to blur the physical environment with an online environment where digital and non-digital elements exist synchronously. IoT and social media facilitate children's interaction with the broader environment while playing virtually and examine how the blurred boundaries for informal and formal social interaction education are well intertwined, of course, through fun learning (Luo et al, 2021;Mantovani et al, 2021). IoT and social media invite all elements of children's education, especially parents and teachers, to explore possibilities to develop children's interaction and cognitive capacities such as creativity, inquiry abilities, and design thinking and how children can be empowered to gain relationships by involving them in the process virtual social interactivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bourke and Loveridge (2018) assert that the use of a CRAG can also reduce the likelihood of the exclusion of marginalised voices, facilitating greater autonomy for diverse groups of children to highlight matters of direct importance to them (Groundwater‐Smith et al, 2015; Mann et al, 2014). During COVID‐19, the possibility of technology‐mediated socially distanced participatory research with children has emerged (Cuevas‐Parra, 2020; Hall et al, 2021; Lomax et al, 2022; Lundy et al, 2021; Luo et al, 2022). This paper extends this work by focusing on the power dynamics that are embedded in these participatory approaches and how these can influence children's participation.…”
Section: Children As Co‐researchers In Pandemic Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%