2022
DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2021.2018381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young children’s contact with their parents in jail and child behavior problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, adults described having had opportunities for continued parent–child contact throughout the prison sentence as potentially buffering some of these negative responses. For example, children in this sample, similar to those in other studies (e.g., Pritzl et al, 2022), seemed to fair better when they had more frequent and open contact with their incarcerated fathers. Opportunities for contact offers parents and children a chance to maintain (or potentially rebuild) relationships during the imprisonment in preparation for the eventual release and family reunification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…That said, adults described having had opportunities for continued parent–child contact throughout the prison sentence as potentially buffering some of these negative responses. For example, children in this sample, similar to those in other studies (e.g., Pritzl et al, 2022), seemed to fair better when they had more frequent and open contact with their incarcerated fathers. Opportunities for contact offers parents and children a chance to maintain (or potentially rebuild) relationships during the imprisonment in preparation for the eventual release and family reunification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As such, extended contact visits can help buffer against some of the emotional and behavioral consequences of parental incarceration and disrupted attachment relationships (Arditti, 2008; Charles et al, 2021; Poehlmann‐Tynan & Pritzl, 2019; Poehlmann‐Tynan et al, 2015). Noncontact visits (i.e., those conducted through video platforms or plastic barriers) have been found to result in negative experiences for parents and children, and to lead parents to perceive lower parent–child closeness and more child behavioral challenges during visits (Beckmeyer & Arditti, 2014; Pritzl et al, 2022). Noncontact visit settings are generally not conducive to high‐quality visits and interactions, particularly with young children who struggle to filter out the ongoing visits of other families next to them (Poehlmann‐Tynan et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Role Of Policy In Shaping Mass (Parental) Incarceration ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have reported how incarcerated persons have lower rates of recidivism (or return to jail or prison) and decreased stress if family ties are maintained through family visits (Martin & Phaneuf, 2018). More recent evidence found that frequent parent child visits in jails that offered both on-site video and Plexiglas visits resulted in fewer child externalizing problems, but jails with only Plexiglas visits resulted in more externalizing behaviors (Pritzl et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%