2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young and older good learners have higher levels of brain nicotinic receptor binding

Abstract: Neuronal αβ heteromeric and α7 homomeric nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) were compared in 4-and 27-month rabbits selected for learning proficiency. Sixty 4-and 60 27-month rabbits received the α7 nAChR agonist (MEM-3389), galantamine, or vehicle during training in trace eyeblink classical conditioning. Brain tissue from the best and worst young and older learners was analyzed with radioligand binding. Vehicle-treated 4-and 27-month good learners had higher αβ heteromeric nAChR binding in hippocampus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance variability among groups in our study does not appear to result from simple sensory or motor differences, given no differences in baseline acoustic physiology or initial escape latencies. A recent preliminary report suggests an anatomical correlate to our result, in that "good learners" of a classical conditioning task have higher levels of nAChRs ([ 3 H]epibatidine binding) in hippocampus and temporal-parietal cortex than "poor learners" (Woodruff-Pak, Lehr, Li, and Chen, 2007). Although nAChR binding levels do not always reflect function (due to, for example, receptor internalization, inactivation or desensitization), higher levels of cortical nAChRs could underlie our results in "good" performers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Performance variability among groups in our study does not appear to result from simple sensory or motor differences, given no differences in baseline acoustic physiology or initial escape latencies. A recent preliminary report suggests an anatomical correlate to our result, in that "good learners" of a classical conditioning task have higher levels of nAChRs ([ 3 H]epibatidine binding) in hippocampus and temporal-parietal cortex than "poor learners" (Woodruff-Pak, Lehr, Li, and Chen, 2007). Although nAChR binding levels do not always reflect function (due to, for example, receptor internalization, inactivation or desensitization), higher levels of cortical nAChRs could underlie our results in "good" performers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In conclusion, our data add to previous findings suggesting that the VTA-hippocampus dopaminergic loop is a final common pathway for both top-down and bottom-up influences on late memory processing and indicates, as proposed formerly, that modulation of a7-nAChR may represent an important target for treatment of the increased forgetting observed in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and AD patients (Woodruff-Pak et al 2010;Kawamata and Shimohama 2011;Wallace and Porter 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Finally, the fact that the vast majority of relationships between nAChR binding and task performance were observed with α4β2* binding suggests that α4β2* nAChRs may play a more prominent role than α7 nAChRs in modulating cost benefit decision making. Indeed, in brain the α4β2* nAChR subtype is associated with release of dopamine and norepinephrine (both of which strongly modulate cost benefit decision making, Pattij and Vanderschuren, 2008) in most brain regions and predominates in density and distribution (Picciotto et al, 1998; Perry et al, 2002; Granon et al, 2003; Woodruff-Pak et al, 2008; Le Foll et al, 2009), whereas the α7 nAChR subtype comprises only about 10% of all nAChRs (Young et al, 2004; Keller et al, 2005; Curzon et al, 2006; Hoyle et al, 2006; see Figures 2 and 3). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%