Young adults who mix alcohol with energy drinks: Typology of risk-taking behaviour

Peacock, Amy; Bruno, Raimondo

doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.012

Cited by 18 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Peacock and Bruno () divided 403 young Australian AMED consumers into groups of low‐risk‐taking consumers (38%), disinhibited intake consumers (48%), and high‐risk‐taking consumers (14%). When comparing the three groups, the disinhibited intake and high‐risk‐taking AMED consumers exhibited higher trait impulsivity scores and were also more commonly male and had greater AMED and alcohol consumption.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED): A critical review and meta‐analysis

Verster

Benson

Johnson

et al. 2018

Human Psychopharmacology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to critically review the (1) prevalence of alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED) consumption, (2) motives for AMED consumption, (3) correlates of AMED consumption, and (4) whether AMED consumption has an impact on (a) alcohol consumption, (b) subjective intoxication, and (c) risk‐taking behavior.Overall a minority of the population consumes AMED, typically infrequently. Motives for AMED consumption are predominantly hedonistic and social. Meta‐analyses revealed that AMED consumers drink significantly more alcohol than alcohol‐only (AO) consumers. Within‐subject comparisons restricted to AMED consumers revealed that alcohol consumption does not significantly differ between typical AMED and AO occasions. On past month heaviest drinking occasions, AMED users consume significantly less alcohol on AMED occasions when compared to AO occasions. AMED consumers experience significantly fewer negative consequences and risk‐taking behavior on AMED occasions compared with AO occasions. Meta‐analyses of subjective intoxication studies suggest that AMED consumption does not differentially affect subjective intoxication when compared to AO consumption. In conclusion, when compared to AO consumption, mixing alcohol with energy drink does not affect subjective intoxication and seems unlikely to increase total alcohol consumption, associated risk‐taking behavior, nor other negative alcohol‐related consequences. Further research may be necessary to fully reveal the effects of AMED.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED): A critical review and meta‐analysis

Verster

Benson

Johnson

et al. 2018

Human Psychopharmacology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya menemukan bahwa tekanan teman sebaya di antara remaja menjadi prediktor kuat bagi remaja untuk terlibat dalam penggunaan alkohol (Trucco, dkk, 2011;Choo & Shek 2013;Peacock & Bruno, 2015), perilaku seksual berisiko (Selikow, dkk., 2009;Crockett, dkk., 2006), aksi kebut-kebutan di jalan (Gheorghiu, dkk., 2015) dan penyesuaian sosial remaja (Oni, 2010).…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Lingkungan Keluarga, Tekanan Teman Sebaya Dan Perilaku Berisiko Remaja Di Kota Bandung

Intannia

Dahlan²,

Damaianti³

2020

JPSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kontribusi lingkungan keluarga dan tekanan teman sebaya terhadap perilaku berisiko remaja di Kota Bandung. Metode penelitan yang digunakan adalah metode kuantitatif dengan responden sebanyak 486 remaja berusia 13-18 tahun di Kota Bandung. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian yaitu adaptasi dari Family Environment Scale untuk mengukur lingkungan keluarga, Peer Pressure Inventory untuk mengukur tekanan teman sebaya, dan Negative Risk Behaviour Scale untuk mengukur perilaku berisiko. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan yaitu regresi berganda. Hasil yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh lingkungan keluarga dan tekanan teman sebaya terhadap perilaku berisiko. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat digunakan sebagai acuan bagi keluarga dan para orang tua dalam pentingnya menciptakan lingkungan yang positif dalam kehidupan keluarga bagi anak-anaknya sebagai salah satu upaya preventif terhadap terjadinya perilaku berisiko pada remaja.

show abstract

“…So far, alcohol use has only been described in terms of its abuse and is potential to increase the risk of burnout syndrome (van der Wal et al 2016). In contrast, while consumption of energy drinks has been associated with impulsiveness, anxiety and sleep disorders, among others, no direct link to burnout has been reported, let alone any possible U-shaped relationship (Peacock and Bruno 2015;Ali et al 2015). It has been postulated that mixing alcohol and energy drinks may have a negative influence on neurological and cardiovascular health by encouraging binge drinking (Marczinski 2015); however, no interaction between alcohol and energy drink use was diagnosed in the present study.…”

Section: Other Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can chronotype and social jet lag predict burnout among physical therapists?

Mokros

Koprowicz

Leszczyński

et al. 2019

Biological Rhythm Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Burnout syndrome can be described as a set of psychological and somatic responses to chronic stress related to professional work. The aim of this study was to verify whether chronotype and social jetlag (SJL) are predictors of burnout symptoms among physical therapists. The studied sample consisted of 61 physical therapists. Variables of interest included raw scores of the following tools: the Link Burnout Questionnaire (LBQ), Chronotype Questionnaire (CQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and an authored questionnaire regarding sociodemographics and information required to calculate SJL. Linear regression models were constructed to predict LBQ dimension scores. An increase in the Psychophysical Exhaustion score was associated with a decrease in CQ Morningness-Eveningness (ME) score, an increase in CQ Distinctness of the Rhythm (DI) score and a decrease in SJL. Also, the Psychophysical Exhaustion score was higher for subjects reporting fairly poor quality sleep (PSQI) than for rating it as very good. An interaction was identified between SJL and ME. An increase in Sense of Professional Ineffectiveness was predicted by a decreased SJL score, and increased Disillusionment was associated with higher DI score. Both chronotype and SJL may prove useful predictors of certain aspects of burnout among physical therapists, but they should be considered together.

show abstract

Young adults who mix alcohol with energy drinks: Typology of risk-taking behaviour

Cited by 18 publications

References 14 publications

Alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED): A critical review and meta‐analysis

Alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED): A critical review and meta‐analysis

Lingkungan Keluarga, Tekanan Teman Sebaya Dan Perilaku Berisiko Remaja Di Kota Bandung

Can chronotype and social jet lag predict burnout among physical therapists?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About