2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00508.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young Adolescents' Perceptions of Teachers' and Peers' Goals as Predictors of Social and Academic Goal Pursuit

Abstract: Young Mexican American adolescents' perceptions of socially derived goals of teachers and peers were examined as predictors of their pursuit of social goals (to be prosocial and responsible) and academic goals (to learn and to perform well), while controlling for perceived parental goals. The role of perceived emotional caring in mediating relations between socially derived goals and goal pursuit also was examined. Results of multiple regression analyses indicated that social and academic expectations from pee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect sizes (as indicated by Cohen d-values) range from small to medium, with the largest differences occurring for well-being goals (C, F, I, L) and goals with the strongest socially shared dimension: J, K, L. In goals that satisfy both types, the wellbeing directed goals of cell L with social sharing that strong that Others and Self are confounded, the d-value equals 0.57: female students score 7% higher than male students. These outcomes are in line with those in Wentzel et al (2012), that also favour female students, with larger effects for social goals than for learning and performance goals. consequence of the particular educational environment governing the application.…”
Section: From Those Tests Percentage Differences T-values and D-vasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Effect sizes (as indicated by Cohen d-values) range from small to medium, with the largest differences occurring for well-being goals (C, F, I, L) and goals with the strongest socially shared dimension: J, K, L. In goals that satisfy both types, the wellbeing directed goals of cell L with social sharing that strong that Others and Self are confounded, the d-value equals 0.57: female students score 7% higher than male students. These outcomes are in line with those in Wentzel et al (2012), that also favour female students, with larger effects for social goals than for learning and performance goals. consequence of the particular educational environment governing the application.…”
Section: From Those Tests Percentage Differences T-values and D-vasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Peer relationships take on a heightened significance in adolescence (Hartup, 1982; Martin & Dowson, 2009; Wentzel, 2005). Adolescents' feelings of relatedness with classroom peers, including the sense that one belongs to the classroom community (Goodenow, 1993), are associated with perceptions of the classroom motivational climate (Anderman, 2003), achievement motivation (Anderman & Anderman, 1999; Nelson & DeBacker, 2008), school interest (Wentzel, Battle, Russell, & Looney, 2010), prosocial goal pursuit (Wentzel, 1998; Wentzel, Baker, & Russell, 2012), self-efficacy beliefs (Nelson & DeBacker, 2008; Ryan & Patrick, 2001), expectancies for success (Goodenow, 1993), and behavioral and emotional engagement (Furrer & Skinner, 2003). Students who feel less connected to their peers report low emotional engagement in school (Furrer & Skinner, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Multifaceted Nature of Adolescents' Peer Experiences Different research lines have focused on facets of adolescents' peer experiences. For instance, research into peer influence has examined positive domains such as peer prosociality (Barry & Wentzel, 2006) and academic achievement (Wentzel, Baker, & Russell, 2012) but particularly associations between deviant peer behavior and adolescent development have received attention (e.g., Haynie & Osgood, 2005). Substantial estimates of peer influence were yielded even in studies that controlled for selection effects (Knecht, Snijders, Baerveldt, Steglich, & Raub, 2010), which reflect the tendency to affiliate with those whom one perceives as behaviorally similar (Veenstra, Dijkstra, Steglich, & Zalk, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%