You Want to Spend My Money How? Framing Effects on Tax Increases via Ballot Propositions

Abstract

Recent scholarly work has discovered that modest changes in the framing of the titles and summaries of ballot measures can have dramatic effects on voter approval. This work expands upon these findings by exploring the effect of language specificity on support for ballot propositions that require the voter to pay for the measure with tax dollars. Although extensive research has explored ballot measure language complexity (e.g., position on the ballot, electoral effects, and prepossessed knowledge have all been shown to play a role in the outcome for propositions), left unanswered is the role of detailed language in altering support. Utilizing original experimental data, this work explores the framing effects of increasing specificity of proposed use of tax expenditures on support for ballot questions. Ultimately, this research finds that propositions providing more information to voters substantially increases the likelihood of support for those measures. Moreover, this increased specificity also bolsters certainty as to how the money will be spent, and intensifies how strongly voters feel about the issues being considered.

Attitudes on the Size of Unemployment Benefits: Ideology and Numbers

“…Therefore, future studies may want to investigate whether such questions on the minimum wage are vulnerable to, for instance, anchoring and precisions effects. Second, voters do on occasion get to determine specific policies through, for example, ballot propositions in favor of specific tax rates or bond programs (Matsusaka ; Braidwood ). Again, voters’ decision making on such propositions may easily be affected by the way in which the numbers are presented.…”