2021
DOI: 10.1111/plar.12414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“You Have a Lot to Answer For”: Human Rights, Matriliny, and the Mediation of Family Conflicts at the Department of Social Welfare in Ghana

Abstract: Scholars have argued that the implementation of legal reforms in African settings has largely failed because of the persistence of norms and values that privilege collective interests over individual rights. With a focus on the work of the Department of Social Welfare (DSW) in a matrilineal Asante town in Ghana, this article reflects on the potential for state institutions to implement a human rights perspective through family dispute resolution processes. In this context, the key factors that influence the wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ghana, a woman wanted to prove, in front of witnesses, that she was not responsible for her failed marriage and she sought to clear her name, and that of her family, rather than get her husband in trouble (Salifu 2021: 131). The woman pursued justice in an office of the Department of Social Welfare (DSW), an institution that sought to ‘uphold the rights of women even as they recognize the customary and religious norms articulated by opposing litigants’ (Salifu 2021: 125). The DSW is an example of an institution that is operating in the context of legal pluralism.…”
Section: Access To Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ghana, a woman wanted to prove, in front of witnesses, that she was not responsible for her failed marriage and she sought to clear her name, and that of her family, rather than get her husband in trouble (Salifu 2021: 131). The woman pursued justice in an office of the Department of Social Welfare (DSW), an institution that sought to ‘uphold the rights of women even as they recognize the customary and religious norms articulated by opposing litigants’ (Salifu 2021: 125). The DSW is an example of an institution that is operating in the context of legal pluralism.…”
Section: Access To Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSW is an example of an institution that is operating in the context of legal pluralism. As Salifu argues ‘the extent to which a human rights institution such as the DSW (Department of Social Welfare) is able to change gender norms depends on the level of freedom individuals have within a social environment to litigate their personal issues’ (Salifu 2021: 130). By bringing her concerns to the DSW, this woman challenged gender norms and expectations.…”
Section: Access To Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of the organization consists of a national headquarters with regional and district offices across the country. One of the major preoccupations of the district offices is the mediation of family disputes concerning spousal and child support (Salifu, 2021). In addition to these, some of the DSW staff operate in hospitals (hospital welfare), schools, orphanages and correctional institutions.…”
Section: Background To the Department Of Social Welfare (Dsw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But recent scholarship has sought to upend such assumptions, focusing instead on how customary legal realms can prove to be dynamic and open to new forms of claims‐making, especially by women. Scholars in South Africa, for instance, have argued that despite the perception that customary law provides the means for older men to reproduce patriarchal power structures, customary land rights may represent potential resources for women seeking to assert their rights to land that is overwhelmingly formally owned by men (Claassens and Mnisi 2009; see also Salifu 2021). This emphasis on the “living” nature of customary law reveals that the legal practices perceived as “traditional” and “customary” are continually being reformed for modern conditions, often in ways that blur the binaries that have long constrained our understanding of African cultural perspectives on legal rights and relationships.…”
Section: Cehurd: the Antipolitics Of Asking And Listeningmentioning
confidence: 99%