You gotta move: advancing the debate on the record of dispersal

Goetz, Edward G.; Chapple, Karen

doi:10.1080/10511481003779876

Cited by 87 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A striking example is the net loss of hundreds of thousands of deeply affordable housing units in recent decades amidst the redevelopment of public housing sites into mixed income communities, with the displaced residents most often given vouchers to access privately-owned rental housing, but with few choices beyond high-poverty neighborhoods (Goetz, 2011;Goetz & Chapple, 2010). The distinctions within and among protective tenures are important and surely worthy of further analysis.…”

Section: Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breaking the Double Impasse: Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States

Wegmann

Schafran

Pfeiffer

2016

Housing Policy Debate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What might be described as a double impasse characterizes debate on U.S. housing tenure, with advocates fighting for rental or ownership housing on one side and "Third Way" or mixed tenure solutions on the other. Breaking this impasse requires disengaging from conceptions of an idealized form of tenure and instead advocating making virtually all tenures as secure and supported as possible, so that diverse households are able to live in homes that best fit their changing needs over their lifecycles. This essay 1) presents data on the variety of tenures in the U.S., 2) conveys a new two-dimensional map of tenure according to their degrees of control and potential for wealth-building, and 3) shows how U.S. institutions shape their risks and subsidies. Most U.S. tenures are at least somewhat risky, including those that receive the greatest federal subsidies. A new housing system is needed to secure and support as many tenures as possible.

show abstract

Section: Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breaking the Double Impasse: Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States

Wegmann

Schafran

Pfeiffer

2016

Housing Policy Debate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Il prévoit en effet la destruction nette d'un large stock de logements sociaux et leur remplacement par des ensembles résidentiels mixtes, auxquels tous les ménages n'auront pas accès en raison des critères d'attribution appliqués par les PHA. La relocalisation constitue donc le principal effet du programme pour une large proportion des ménages (Goetz, 2010 ;Goetz et Chapple, 2010).…”

Section: La Localisation Des Ménages Aidés éTudes Et éValuationsunclassified

Le difficile arrimage entre les politiques sociales et la responsabilité individuelle : le cas des politiques du logement aux États-Unis

Leloup

2012

lsp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Les politiques du logement promouvant la production d’un parc immobilier à caractère social ont fait l’objet de nombreuses critiques. Pour y remédier, plusieurs pays ont opté pour des aides directes aux ménages. Les États-Unis illustrent parfaitement ce basculement entre une aide centrée sur la production et la gestion d’ensembles résidentiels à caractère social et celle axée sur les capacités des ménages à se trouver un logement sur le marché privé. Leurs politiques du logement constituent donc un cas particulièrement intéressant à analyser afin de comprendre comment s’opère l’arrimage entre des politiques sociales et la responsabilité individuelle. C’est ce que se propose de faire cet état de la question sur l’utilisation par les ménages de leurs allocations au logement dans le cadre de différents programmes de réhabilitation du parc social et de déconcentration de la pauvreté.Government policies that promote construction of social housing have been widely criticized. In an effort to address this criticism, a number of countries have opted instead to provide direct aid to households. The United States offers a perfect example of this flip-flopping between aid focused on the construction and management of social housing and aid designed to help households find housing on the private market. American housing policies thus constitute a particularly interesting case for analysis in seeking to understand how social policies can be tailored to respect individual responsibility. That is the issue explored in this paper on how households use the housing allowances they receive under various programs designed to refurbish the social housing stock and fight poverty

show abstract

“…The Hope VI program, for example, exemplifies these conflicts: redevelopment of distressed public housing, dispersal of households with vouchers, suspension of the one-to-one replacement of demolished units, and implementation of the one-strike rule (Goetz and Chapple 2010;Hanlon 2012;Hellegers 1999;Johnson 2001). Under regional initiatives, rotating municipal leadership governs regional agencies under the aegis of cooperation (Lindstrom 2010;Vogel and Nezelkewicz 2002;Wheeler 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

State Mandates, Housing Elements, and Low-income Housing Production

Ramsey-Musolf

2017

Journal of Planning Literature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to create low-income housing opportunities and mitigate exclusionary zoning, in 1968 Congress mandated that municipalities receiving comprehensive planning funds must create a housing element. In tandem, many states mandated that municipal housing elements must accommodate low-income housing needs. After examining empirical research for California, Florida, Illinois, and Minnesota, this review found aspirational success because those states rewarded the municipal planning process. In order to increase low-income housing, this review argues for state housing policy reform. Under US Department of Housing and Urban Development's revised fair housing rule, which requires an assessment of local data, states can no longer ignore the exclusionary behavior of municipalities.

show abstract

You gotta move: advancing the debate on the record of dispersal

Cited by 87 publications

References 74 publications

Breaking the Double Impasse: Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States

Breaking the Double Impasse: Securing and Supporting Diverse Housing Tenures in the United States

Le difficile arrimage entre les politiques sociales et la responsabilité individuelle : le cas des politiques du logement aux États-Unis

State Mandates, Housing Elements, and Low-income Housing Production

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About