You Aren’t What You Wear: An Exploration into Infinifat Identity Construction and Performance through Fashion

Abstract

Through remote wardrobe interviews with five self-identified infinifat participants, this paper explores how those existing in a body larger than a US dress-size 32 access fashion. The majority of research that has occurred at the intersection of fat studies and fashion studies has focused on the fashion and dressing experiences of women who fit the conventional definition of “plus-size.” Commercially available, mass-produced fashion options drop off dramatically for women larger than a US dress-size 28 and become almost non-existent for those who are a size 32 or larger. By focusing on infinifat or superfat people who exist beyond a size 32 I draw attention to the impact that the lack of access to fashion has on the subjectivities infinifat people can perform. The findings in this paper build from existing literature on plus-size dressing that focuses on limitations in identity construction and performance experienced by those who are able to access commercially available plus-size fashion. Without readily available, situationally-appropriate clothing, infinifat and superfat people are limited in the subjectivities they can perform and are excluded from specific social spaces. This exclusion serves to remarginalize an already marginalized group and is felt most acutely by those who embody additional marginalized identity markers, such as those who are racialized or living in poverty. In this way, the findings presented in this paper further address the infinifat-sized gain existing literature on plus-size dressing and lay the foundation for future work that engages with the infinifatshion community.

Too fat to learn: Sizeism as a barrier to college student learning.

“…Identifications are often—but not solely—connected to clothing sizes and (un)availability in relation to size. Example “fategories” include small fat, mid fat, large fat, superfat, infinifat, and so forth (Evans, 2020; Gerhardt, 2021). While we do not engage this level of granularity in our study, it is important to hold the context and nuance that fatness is relative and on a spectrum.…”