2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yorkshire Enhanced Stop Smoking (YESS) study: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of adding a personalised smoking cessation intervention to a lung cancer screening programme

Abstract: IntroductionIntegration of smoking cessation (SC) into lung cancer screening is essential to optimise clinical and cost effectiveness. The most effective way to use this ‘teachable moment’ is unclear. The Yorkshire Enhanced Stop Smoking study will measure the effectiveness of an SC service integrated within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) and will test the efficacy of a personalised SC intervention, incorporating incidental findings detected on the low-dose CT scan performed as part of YLST.Methods a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A substantial proportion of the screening eligible population is expected to consist of current smokers; over half of the participants of CT lung screening trials consisted of current smokers 1‐8 . Various approaches for integrating smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening are being considered, with a recent review suggesting that personalised, multimodal approaches are the most successful in changing smoking behaviours 142‐146 . Yet, if integrated successfully, these interventions may aid in reducing both future lung cancer risk as well as the risk for other tobacco‐related comorbidities 147,148 .…”
Section: Future Opportunities For Risk‐stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A substantial proportion of the screening eligible population is expected to consist of current smokers; over half of the participants of CT lung screening trials consisted of current smokers 1‐8 . Various approaches for integrating smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening are being considered, with a recent review suggesting that personalised, multimodal approaches are the most successful in changing smoking behaviours 142‐146 . Yet, if integrated successfully, these interventions may aid in reducing both future lung cancer risk as well as the risk for other tobacco‐related comorbidities 147,148 .…”
Section: Future Opportunities For Risk‐stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Various approaches for integrating smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening are being considered, with a recent review suggesting that personalised, multimodal approaches are the most successful in changing smoking behaviours. [142][143][144][145][146] Yet, if integrated successfully, these interventions may aid in reducing both future lung cancer risk as well as the risk for other tobacco-related comorbidities. 147,148 Decision-aids and the assessment of eligibility for lung cancer screening could be further enhanced by quantifying the effects of smoking cessation on future lung cancer risk and life expectancy for individuals who currently smoke.…”
Section: Future Opportunities For Risk-stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participant data, including contact details, demographic information and service process and outcome data was secured on a password protected service database using data management methods outlined in the YESS study protocol [15]. Patients were contacted by the study manager who gave details of the service and use of personal data.…”
Section: Data Collection and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54,55 Participants with indeterminate results may have a higher quit rate than others 54 and this has led to further research testing whether detailed information about abnormalities on the CT such as emphysema and coronary artery calcification can help incentivise participants to quit. 56 Smoking cessation rates, as expected strongly influence any cost-effectiveness analysis. 57…”
Section: Smoking Cessationmentioning
confidence: 74%