YooSee

Azzopardi, Leif; Dowie, Douglas; Marshall, Kelly

doi:10.1145/2348283.2348442

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the results also showed that the participants were unsure about the benefit of the browser for unfamiliar videos. Azzopardi et al [2012] present a video browsing interface that is designed for easy discovery and navigation of online video for young children. They argue that while online sources like YouTube offer great content appropriate for children, the interfaces are too complicated for them.…”

Section: Keyboard and Mousementioning

confidence: 99%

Video Interaction Tools

Schoeffmann

Hudelist

Huber³

2015

ACM Comput. Surv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital video enables manifold ways of multimedia content interaction. Over the last decade, many proposals for improving and enhancing video content interaction were published. More recent work particularly leverages on highly capable devices such as smartphones and tablets that embrace novel interaction paradigms, for example, touch, gesture-based or physical content interaction. In this article, we survey literature at the intersection of Human-Computer Interaction and Multimedia. We integrate literature from video browsing and navigation, direct video manipulation, video content visualization, as well as interactive video summarization and interactive video retrieval. We classify the reviewed works by the underlying interaction method and discuss the achieved improvements so far. We also depict a set of open problems that the video interaction community should address in future.

show abstract

Section: Keyboard and Mousementioning

confidence: 99%

Video Interaction Tools

Schoeffmann

Hudelist

Huber³

2015

ACM Comput. Surv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A framework for interaction with touch interfaces has been proposed by van Dijk et al [2012]. Showcases applying this research have been shown by Azzopardi et al [2012a;Azzopardi et al [2012b;Azzopardi et al [2012c].…”

Section: Browsing Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Search and Browsing Behavior of Young Users on the Web

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet is increasingly used by young children for all kinds of purposes. Nonetheless, there are not many resources especially designed for children on the Internet and most of the content online is designed for grown-up users. This situation is problematic if we consider the large differences between young users and adults since their topic interests, computer skills, and language capabilities evolve rapidly during childhood. There is little research aimed at exploring and measuring the difficulties that children encounter on the Internet when searching for information and browsing for content. In the first part of this work, we employed query logs from a commercial search engine to quantify the difficulties children of different ages encounter on the Internet and to characterize the topics that they search for. We employed query metrics (e.g., the fraction of queries posed in natural language), session metrics (e.g., the fraction of abandoned sessions), and click activity (e.g., the fraction of ad clicks). The search logs were also used to retrace stages of child development. Concretely, we looked for changes in interests (e.g., the distribution of topics searched) and language development (e.g., the readability of the content accessed and the vocabulary size). In the second part of this work, we employed toolbar logs from a commercial search engine to characterize the browsing behavior of young users, particularly to understand the activities on the Internet that trigger search. We quantified the proportion of browsing and search activity in the toolbar sessions and we estimated the likelihood of a user to carry out search on the Web vertical and multimedia verticals (i.e., videos and images) given that the previous event is another search event or a browsing event. We observed that these metrics clearly demonstrate an increased level of confusion and unsuccessful search sessions among children. We also found a clear relation between the reading level of the clicked pages and characteristics of the users such as age and educational attainment. In terms of browsing behavior, children were found to start their activities on the Internet with a search engine (instead of directly browsing content) more often than adults. We also observed a significantly larger amount of browsing activity for the case of teenager users. Interestingly we also found that if children visit knowledge-related Web sites (i.e., information-dense pages such as Wikipedia articles), they subsequently do more Web searches than adults. Additionally, children and especially teenagers were found to have a greater tendency to engage in multimedia search, which calls to improve the aggregation of multimedia results into the current search result pages.

show abstract

“…There is a scarcity of interactive information retrieval (IIR) research involving people with intellectual disability [10], particularly when it comes to exploring information access by people who are nonverbal. There has been research in designing interfaces and new modes of interaction for non literate participants, such as children [3]. However, the focus is on media in very small datasets, which relates to information presentation rather than interaction or search.…”

Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing an IIR Research Apparatus with Users with Severe Intellectual Disability

Birčanin

Sitbon

Favre

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional methods of engagement with pre-defined queries, verbal instruction and interviewing do not provide necessary means to address information-seeking behavior and visual browsing for participants with severe autism and intellectual disability. In this paper, we identify challenges and characteristics of providing effective methods to explore visual browsing and video recommender systems with one non-verbal participant with autism and intellectual disability. We contribute a case study and a reflection on a) how iterative design approaches that builds on special interests and strengths of one individual with disability can support experimental IIR research in becoming more inclusive, b) some of the ethical consideration that arise in the tensions between participation in the research and other interests and c) how flexible experimental and apparatus design can further allow participant's terms to prevail. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Accessibility; • Information systems → Users and interactive retrieval.

show abstract

YooSee

Cited by 7 publications

References 2 publications

Video Interaction Tools

Video Interaction Tools

Analysis of Search and Browsing Behavior of Young Users on the Web

Designing an IIR Research Apparatus with Users with Severe Intellectual Disability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About