1996
DOI: 10.1086/177338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YOHKOH Observations of Fe XXVI X-Ray Line Emission from Solar Flares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified the lower and higher energy lines with Fe xxv(r) and Fe xxvi Lyα emission respectively. The expected energy for the Fe xxv(r) line is 6.700 keV 7 , and that for the Fe xxvi Lyα line is 6.966 keV (Pike et al 1996). It can be seen from Table 2 Table 2).…”
Section: Fe XXV and Fe Xxvi Emission Linesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We identified the lower and higher energy lines with Fe xxv(r) and Fe xxvi Lyα emission respectively. The expected energy for the Fe xxv(r) line is 6.700 keV 7 , and that for the Fe xxvi Lyα line is 6.966 keV (Pike et al 1996). It can be seen from Table 2 Table 2).…”
Section: Fe XXV and Fe Xxvi Emission Linesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Spectral lines decaying from doubly excited helium-like ions are essential in understanding the dielectronic recombination process of hydrogen-like ions. The lines that appear as hydrogen-like satellites are often observed in astrophysical plasmas, and the hydrogen-like satellite-to-resonance intensities can be used to measure electron temperatures in solar flares (Dubau et al 1981;Parmar et al 1981;Tanaka 1986;Pike et al 1996). Furthermore, the high-n dielectronic recombination from the hydrogen-like ions can significantly affect some helium-like line ratios from low-lying (n = 2) transitions (Smith et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the local ionization state in the vicinity of the hotspot may not necessarily be the same as the ionization state of the entire accretion disk. The rest energy of Fe K line emission must be some value between 6.404 keV (Fe i; see Bambynek et al 1972) and 6.966 keV (Fe xxvi; see Pike et al 1996). This corresponds to an uncertainty of ±4.2% in the measurement of g for the average rest-energy value in this range.…”
Section: Hotspot Fe K Line Measurement Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%