2013
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.064766-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

yneA mRNA instability is involved in temporary inhibition of cell division during the SOS response of Bacillus megaterium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this organism, we and others have previously identified lexA and noted an open reading frame (designated sosA) that is divergently transcribed from lexA and controlled by the LexA repressor and the SOS response (Anderson et al, 2006;Cirz et al, 2007;Mesak et al, 2008;Cohn et al, 2011). The location of sosA adjacent to lexA indicated that it might encode a cell division inhibitor, as similar gene synteny has been observed for SOS-induced cell division inhibitors encoded by Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria, namely Bacillus subtilis (Kawai et al, 2003), Bacillus megaterium (Buchholz et al, 2013), Listeria monocytogenes (van der Veen et al, 2007;, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Chauhan et al, 2006) and Corynebacterium glutamicum (Ogino et al, 2008) (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this organism, we and others have previously identified lexA and noted an open reading frame (designated sosA) that is divergently transcribed from lexA and controlled by the LexA repressor and the SOS response (Anderson et al, 2006;Cirz et al, 2007;Mesak et al, 2008;Cohn et al, 2011). The location of sosA adjacent to lexA indicated that it might encode a cell division inhibitor, as similar gene synteny has been observed for SOS-induced cell division inhibitors encoded by Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria, namely Bacillus subtilis (Kawai et al, 2003), Bacillus megaterium (Buchholz et al, 2013), Listeria monocytogenes (van der Veen et al, 2007;, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Chauhan et al, 2006) and Corynebacterium glutamicum (Ogino et al, 2008) (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Similarly, YneA from B. subtilis was originally reported to be regulated by proteolysis, although by an undefined mechanism, and a point mutation at its extreme C‐terminus generated a stabilized yet functional variant of the cell division inhibitor (Mo and Burkholder, ). In B. megaterium , the temporal expression of a YneA homologue has been suggested to be due to mRNA instability (Buchholz et al , ). We demonstrate that a minor truncation of the C‐terminus of SosA increases cell division inhibitory activity (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, an as-yet-unidentified component of the B. subtilis late divisome serves as a target for SOS-induced YneA 131 . SulA acts transiently because it is proteolytically unstable, whereas instability of yneA mRNA ensures transient activity of its gene product 132 . Oxygen and heat stress also modulate FtsZ assembly.…”
Section: Metabolic and Stress Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subtilis was reported to be regulated by proteolysis (36), while in B. megaterium, the temporal expression of a YneA homologue has been suggested to be due to mRNA instability (25). We demonstrated that a minor truncation of the C-terminus of SosA yields a hyper-potent cell-division inhibitor (Fig.…”
Section: Endogenous Cell-division Inhibition Must Be Stringently Regumentioning
confidence: 63%
“…and noted an open reading frame (designated sosA) that is divergently transcribed from lexA and is controlled by the LexA repressor and the SOS response (20)(21)(22)(23). The location of sosA adjacent to lexA indicated that it might encode a cell division inhibitor as similar gene synteny has been observed for cell division inhibitors encoded by Gram-positive, rod shaped bacteria namely Bacillus subtilis (24), Bacillus megaterium (25), Listeria monocytogenes (26,27), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (28) and Corynebacterium glutamicum (29) (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%