2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007080303569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, acceptance of the sexual double standard is expected to result in a climate of sexual objectification of the female body, which increases women's mental health risks such as sexual dysfunction and eating disorders (Frederickson and Roberts 1997). Finally, American research has suggested that males' recreational and gender stereotypical attitudes are related to misunderstandings of females' cues (Johnson et al 1991;Smirles 2004) leading to increased ambivalence in dating situations, which has been associated with an increased likelihood of sexual harassment (Krahé et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, acceptance of the sexual double standard is expected to result in a climate of sexual objectification of the female body, which increases women's mental health risks such as sexual dysfunction and eating disorders (Frederickson and Roberts 1997). Finally, American research has suggested that males' recreational and gender stereotypical attitudes are related to misunderstandings of females' cues (Johnson et al 1991;Smirles 2004) leading to increased ambivalence in dating situations, which has been associated with an increased likelihood of sexual harassment (Krahé et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a context, society affords sexual agency more to men than to women. More specifically, SDS may serve to justify male sexual coercion toward women (Krahé et al, 2000;Warner, 2000), possibly because men exerting power over women in a sexual context fit with their agentic role. In addition, male victims of sexual coercion or rape might be perceived as powerless and not willing to have sex, which violates men's (hetero)sexual agentic gender role (Weis, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives On Moderators Of Sdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such ambiguous communication may take the form of saying "no" despite being willing to engage in sex with the other person, which has been related to men's sexual aggression (Krahé, Scheinberger-Olwig, & Kolpin, 2000;Loh, Gidycz, Lobo, & Luthra, 2005). Another form of ambiguous communication consists in consenting to sexual contact that is actually not wanted (O'Sullivan & Allgeier, 1998), which was also found to be associated with sexual aggression perpetration (Krahé et al, 2000). A further behavioural risk factor for sexual aggression is the readiness to engage in casual sexual contacts.…”
Section: Risky Sexual Scripts and Attitudes Towards Sexual Coercionmentioning
confidence: 99%