Untitled

Davis, Anthony; Wagner, John

doi:10.1023/a:1025075923297

Cited by 552 publications

(113 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Another study showed that while the incorporation of TEK on Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) increased the spatial and temporal observational scales of current scientific datasets, this did not occur for snow geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica) (Gagnon and Berteaux 2009). Furthermore, most studies have reported that the quantity, diversity and accuracy of LEK data provided vary among interviewees (Davis and Wagner 2003;Gilchrist et al 2005). Although approaches to limit the reported inter-individual variation in LEK accuracy have been proposed (e.g., careful selection of the participating communities and interviewees) (Davis and Wagner 2003;Gilchrist et al 2005;Gadamus and Raymond-Yakoubian 2015), this has not been formally studied.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, most studies have reported that the quantity, diversity and accuracy of LEK data provided vary among interviewees (Davis and Wagner 2003;Gilchrist et al 2005). Although approaches to limit the reported inter-individual variation in LEK accuracy have been proposed (e.g., careful selection of the participating communities and interviewees) (Davis and Wagner 2003;Gilchrist et al 2005;Gadamus and Raymond-Yakoubian 2015), this has not been formally studied. Additionally, although attention has been given to the critical examination of the mapping methods often used in TEK/LEK research (Gagnon and Berteaux 2009;Tobias 2009;Kowalchuk and Kuhn 2012), it is recognized that the impacts of some TEK/LEK mapping methods on the resulting data continue to produce biases (e.g., bias toward coastal observations) (Hartwig 2009;Kowalchuk and Kuhn 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenges and strategies when mapping local ecological knowledge in the Canadian Arctic: the importance of defining the geographic limits of participants’ common areas of observations

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges and strategies when mapping local ecological knowledge in the Canadian Arctic: the importance of defining the geographic limits of participants’ common areas of observations

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…First, local ecological knowledge can complement limited scientific information; thus, the participation of new stakeholders in the management process can improve the knowledge base (Berkes et al 2000, Davis and Wagner 2003, Wieber et al 2004, Gassalla and Diegues 2011, Linke et al 2011, Röckmann et al 2012, Haapasaari et al 2013) and reveal new information to the regulators. Second, including stakeholders in management is expected to increase the legitimacy of the management by creating understanding and support among the stakeholders for the management measures such as new regulations (Raakjaer and Vedsmand 1995, Degnbol et al 2006, de Vos and Tatenhove 2011, Haapasaari et al 2013.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What does stakeholder involvement mean for fisheries management?

Aanesen¹,

Armstrong²,

Bloomfield³

et al. 2014

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) sets the guidelines for the management of European fisheries. The CFP is revised every 10 years, and the last two revisions have laid the groundwork for extending stakeholder participation in European Union fisheries management. The fishery industry and nongovernmental organization (NGOs) especially are recommended to be given greater influence. In this paper we report results from an international survey on fisheries stakeholders' preferences for the three pillars of sustainable fisheries activities as defined in the CFP: ecological, economic, and social. Results of the survey show that industry member preferences were significantly different from the preferences of authorities, scientists, and NGOs. The preferences of the three latter groups did not vary significantly across stakeholder group. This raises the question of what consequences the planned stakeholder involvement in the CFP may have, given the preferences revealed in our survey.

show abstract

“…We argue here that in the case of policy and practice, consideration of systematic approaches to synthesizing knowledge should not be restricted to reviews of existing literature only. There exists a growing literature on the systematic collection and use of expert-sourced or public knowledge (Davis and Wagner 2003;O'Neill et al 2008;Taewoo 2012;Raymond and Robinson 2013) that might provide an innovative and potentially appropriate complement to standard sources of information in existing literature.…”

Section: Analysis and Presentation Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent controversy has led to calls for increased standardization and transparency in the methods used to synthesize climate change research. Though these debates have focused largely on the biophysical dimensions of climate change, human dimensions research is equally in need of improved methodological approaches for research synthesis. Systematic review approaches, and more recently realist review methods, have been used within the health sciences for decades to guide research synthesis. Despite this, penetration of these approaches into the social and environmental sciences has been limited. Here, we present an analysis of approaches for systematic review and research synthesis and examine their applicability in an adaptation context. Customized review frameworks informed by systematic approaches to research synthesis provide a conceptually appropriate and practical opportunity for increasing methodological transparency and rigor in synthesizing and tracking adaptation research. This review highlights innovative applications of systematic approaches, with a focus on the unique challenges of integrating multiple data sources and formats in reviewing climate change adaptation policy and practice. We present guidelines, key considerations, and recommendations for systematic review in the social sciences in general and adaptation research in particular. We conclude by calling for increased conceptual and methodological development of systematic review approaches to address the methodological challenges of synthesizing and tracking adaptation to climate change.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 552 publications

References 37 publications

Challenges and strategies when mapping local ecological knowledge in the Canadian Arctic: the importance of defining the geographic limits of participants’ common areas of observations

Challenges and strategies when mapping local ecological knowledge in the Canadian Arctic: the importance of defining the geographic limits of participants’ common areas of observations

What does stakeholder involvement mean for fisheries management?

Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About