2002
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.42.3_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yielding and Flow Liquefaction of Loose Sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest IL for loose sand is on or very close to the CSL. Similar observations have also been made by Sladen et al (1985b) and Imam et al (2002).…”
Section: Very Loose Sandsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The highest IL for loose sand is on or very close to the CSL. Similar observations have also been made by Sladen et al (1985b) and Imam et al (2002).…”
Section: Very Loose Sandsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…9 are consistent with theoretical and analytical investigations published in the literature Lade, 1992;Imam et al, 2002;Chu et al, 2003;Been & Jefferies, 2004;Andrade, 2009). In these studies it has been established that instability of granular materials depends on the state of the soil, although slightly different interpretations have been given by different researchers.…”
Section: Soil Statesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These conditions are approximately defined by the instability line shown in Figs 3 and 4. Therefore the instability line is associated with the yield surface, and defines the conditions under which large plastic yielding can take place (Lade, 1992;Chu et al, 1993;Imam et al, 2002). Large plastic yielding has to take place when soil becomes unstable: that is, when large plastic strain develops rapidly.…”
Section: Stress Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12, the initial yield surface f for virgin loose sand sample is pushed outward from the first drained triaxial loading to point C of mobilized stress ratio level g mob . The theoretical yield surface f can be approximated as the shape of the effective stress path [34]. Fig.…”
Section: Initial Gradient Of Effective Stress Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%