1997
DOI: 10.1122/1.550838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield stress in magnetorheological and electrorheological fluids: A comparison between microscopic and macroscopic structural models

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The function relationship between MRFs yield stress and applied magnetic field intensity by experiment was researched by Felt [9]. MRFs with high permeability magnetic particles were researched by Bossis and the positive relationship between yield stress and MRFs volume fraction was investigated [10]. The phenomenon was found by Lemaire that the yield stress increases with the increase of particle diameter when the particle diameter was quite small and yield stress had nothing to do with particle size when the particle diameter was quite big [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The function relationship between MRFs yield stress and applied magnetic field intensity by experiment was researched by Felt [9]. MRFs with high permeability magnetic particles were researched by Bossis and the positive relationship between yield stress and MRFs volume fraction was investigated [10]. The phenomenon was found by Lemaire that the yield stress increases with the increase of particle diameter when the particle diameter was quite small and yield stress had nothing to do with particle size when the particle diameter was quite big [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In uniform external magnetic field H, the free energy of the magnetic fluid containing large aggre gates can be represented as [15,16] ( 9) where Here, is the projection of the total magnetic moment of the suspension onto the axis of the mag netic field (z axis), N a is the number of large droplets in the system, and is the projection of the magnetic moment of a large aggregate onto the axis of the mag netic field. The value of can obviously be resolved into components and that are parallel and per pendicular to the ellipsoid axis:…”
Section: Chain Shaped Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress σ as a function of has maximum at some shear value According to the theory [15], corresponds to the static yield stress of the magnetic fluid. When the external shear stress exceeds the system of aggregates cannot statically compen sate for this stress, so the magnetic suspension starts to flow, which is accompanied by detachment of aggre gates from the channel walls.…”
Section: Chain Shaped Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we have to relate the aspect ratio of the aggregates to the yield stress. Firstly we write that the shear stress is the derivative of the magnetic energy U t versus the strain γ with U t (γ) given by (Bossis et al (1997):…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%