2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield stability evaluation of peanut lines: A comparison of an experimental versus a simulation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study confirms the findings of Banterng et al (2003, 2006) that the CSM‐CROPGRO‐Peanut model can be used to assist yield performance and stability evaluation of peanut breeding lines. The model can be run for as many locations as needed and thus could provide information on environmental responses of the test genotypes over a wide range of environments that could not be obtained from actual field testing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study confirms the findings of Banterng et al (2003, 2006) that the CSM‐CROPGRO‐Peanut model can be used to assist yield performance and stability evaluation of peanut breeding lines. The model can be run for as many locations as needed and thus could provide information on environmental responses of the test genotypes over a wide range of environments that could not be obtained from actual field testing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, the test environments do not normally cover the entire range of environmental conditions of all major production areas of a crop in a target region. Dynamic crop simulation models are now so advanced that they can be used as a multipurpose tool for application in agricultural research (Hoogenboom et al, 1992; Penning de Vries et al, 1993; Boote et al, 2003; Jones et al, 2003; Banterng et al, 2006; Mercau et al, 2007). Because these models can simulate growth and development of crop cultivars under different environmental conditions and management practices, they also have potential to be used in assisting multienvironment evaluation of crop breeding lines (Aggarwal et al, 1995; White, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2003). Recent studies have shown that the CSM‐CROPGRO‐Peanut model, which is also included in the DSSAT programme, can be used as a breeding tool in Thailand to help understand the Genotype × Environment interaction and related issues associated with efficient breeding programmes (Banterng et al. 2003, 2006, Anothai et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process consumes a lot of time and resources, and the scope of the test environments normally does not cover the entire range of environmental conditions for the different production areas in the country. The potential of such an application as a breeding tool has been demonstrated by our recent studies using the CSM‐CROPGRO‐Peanut model (Banterng et al, 2003, 2006). We found that the model could predict the relative mean performances of 12 advanced large‐seeded peanut lines tested in 12 environments and of 14 advanced small‐seeded peanut lines tested in three environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%