2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-016-0511-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield, quality and profitability of sensor-controlled irrigation: a case study of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They noted that there was less occurrence of plant diseases in the nursery due to the elimination of over-watering. Saavoss et al [112] reported a 65% increase in profit due to the implementation of a wireless sensor network-based closed-loop control system in a nursery. The authors noted that the increase in profit was due to improvement in crop quality and yield resulting from the precise control of irrigation applications.…”
Section: Decision Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted that there was less occurrence of plant diseases in the nursery due to the elimination of over-watering. Saavoss et al [112] reported a 65% increase in profit due to the implementation of a wireless sensor network-based closed-loop control system in a nursery. The authors noted that the increase in profit was due to improvement in crop quality and yield resulting from the precise control of irrigation applications.…”
Section: Decision Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water savings alone were not adequate to encourage investment in sensor networks; growers changed practice only when there was a financial incentive from reduced production time, lower plant losses, or reduced chemical inputs. Changes in practice (i.e., sensor network for irrigation control) were often applied to additional areas under production after the technology was proven effective, accurate, and easy to use and maintain [49][50][51]. Reduction in labor requirements and pumping costs were appreciable for sensor network applications in containerized pot-in-pot production system [52].…”
Section: Economic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VWC indicates the quantity of water available per unit volume of medium, which is easy to measure and control as long as the lower limit (LL) and drained upper limit (DUL) thresholds are defined (Smith 529 and Mullins, 2000;Jones, 2004;Lal and Shuckla, 2004;Gebregiorgis and Savage, 2006). In contrast, the soil water potential is the energy status of water per unit volume of medium, which directly determines whether the substrate water is available to plants (Scanlon et al, 2002;Jones, 2004;Bittelli, 2010;Lea-Cox et al, 2011). Both are related to each other, but this relationship is different for different substrates and depends on pore size distribution (Gebregiorgis and Savage, 2006;Van Iersel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Scheduling Irrigation In Small-volume Containersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in commercial nurseries which support the agricultural and forestry sectors, it is becoming increasingly important to develop efficient irrigation systems. Improved irrigation practices by nurseries can save water and reduce the costs of irrigation, and have the potential to improve seedling quality, reduce leaching of nutrients, and lower the incidence of pathogen infestation (Belayneh et al, 2013;Lichtenberg et al, 2013;Bayer et al, 2015;Saavoss et al, 2016;Lea-Cox et al, 2017;Wheeler et al, 2017). Many biological and biophysical processes, such as seed germination, seedling nutrition and growth, as well as transpiration and evaporative cooling, are dependent on sufficient moisture via efficient irrigation (Bittelli, 2010;2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%