Yield Potential of Interplanted Annual Food Crops in Southeastern U. S.¹

Abstract

Intercropping may be one way to increase the productivity of land. If so, it is of scientific as well as practical interest to know how the increase is achieved and devise methodologies which will exploit such systems to the fullest. This report compares the productivity of two component intercrops with that of their respective monocultures under differing nitrogen regimes. Two soil conditions were tested in each of 2 years—a poorly drained Portsmouth fsl (Typic Umbraquult, fine‐loamy, mixed, thermic) and a well drained Orangeburg sl (Typic Paleudult, fine‐loamy, silicious, thermic). Treatment variables were cropping system (intercrops vs. monocultures), row arrangement, and N rates from zero to 270 kg/ha. Corn (Zea mays L.) was used as the overstory crop and soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.), snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), or sweet potatoes (Ipomea batatas Lam) as the interplanted understory species. All interplanted species were at the same population as their monoculture checks. With adequate N, monoculture corn in conventional rows (97 un) averaged 9,400 kg/ha. Planting monoculture corn in paired 46‐cm rows, with 147 cm between row pairs, caused a 12% reduction in yield. An additional reduction of 5 to 10% resulted when soybeans or snapbeans were interplanted into corn in the 147‐cm space between row pairs. Monoculture soybeans yielded 2,750 kg/ha with only minor variations among sites. Interplanted soybean yields were site and year dependent, however, and varied from 33 to 55% of their respective monocultures. Intercrop soybean yields were inversely related to the amount of N applied to corn. Yields of spring‐planted monoculture snapbeans ranged from 7,000 to 15,500 kg of fresh pods/ha. Regardless of yield level, however, interplanted snapbeans yielded 48% of the monoculture check. Fall snapbeans, relay interplanted into maturing corn in mid‐August, also produced about 50% of a crop. Land equivalent ratios (LER) of 1.20 to 1.40 thus suggest a 20 to 40% increase in total productivity during one 200‐day season by intercropping. Higher production by intercrops was most easily interpreted in terms of total leaf exposure. Monoculture corn had a leaf‐area duration (LAD) of 150 days; but when soybeans were interplanted into corn, LAD of the intercrop exceeded 300 days.

Intercropping of Corn with Soybean and Lupin for Silage: Effect of Seeding Date on Yield and Quality

“…Corn biomass was not affected by any treatments at either site in 1994 ( Tables 6 and 7). Such variability in corn yields has previously been reported for other intercropping systems and locations ( Cordero and Mccollum 1979, Crookston and Hill 1979, Allen and Obura 1983).…”

Crop Rotation and Intercropping Strategies for Weed Management

“…Intercropping has been criticized as being incompatible with "modem," mechanized agriculture in developed countries, but this argument should be examined carefully. First, while intercropping is commonly practiced on small farms in the tropics with few technological improvements, intercropping yield advantages are not restricted to such situations (see, e.g., Cordero and McCollum 1979, Hall and Kephart 1991. Second, many intercropping systems are already compatible with existing farm machinery; a common example in mechanized, temperate zone agriculture is the use of cereal/forage legume mixtures (e.g., barley/red clover, oat/alfalfa).…”

“…Second, many intercropping systems are already compatible with existing farm machinery; a common example in mechanized, temperate zone agriculture is the use of cereal/forage legume mixtures (e.g., barley/red clover, oat/alfalfa). Finally, as noted by Sanchez (1976), Cordero and McCollum (1979), and Vandermeer(1989), the lack of appropriate machinery for planting, tending, and harvesting intercrops may represent only a lack of attention from agricultural engineers, not an inherent incompatibility of intercropping with machinery. Interest in the use of intercropping under fully mechanized conditions has increased because this approach is considered a potential means of maintaining or increasing crop produc- t Data were rank-transformed because of heterogeneous variances.…”

Growth, Yield and Land Use Efficiency of Corn and Legumes Grown under Intercropping Systems

“…The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) is commonly used in research on intercropping to determine land-use efficiency (Cordero and McCollum, 1979). However, the LER method is calculated based on land area without consideration of the time the field is dedicated to production.…”