Yield and nutrient uptake dissected through complementarity and selection effects in the maize/soybean intercropping

Abstract

The yield and nutrient uptake advantages in an intercropping system are commonly supposed to be driven by the overall functional complementarity and temporal/space niche differentiation between the species. However, studies on the separation of the complementarity effect (CE) and selection effect (SE) on yield and nutrient uptake to understand the underlying mechanisms of intercropping mediated by N application rates are relatively few. Here, field experiments with four N application rates (maize: 0, 180, 240, and 300 kg N ha−1; soybean: 0, 40, 80, and 120 kg N ha−1) were conducted to study yield and nutrient uptake advantages in the maize/soybean intercropping system in 2017 and 2018. Intercropping significantly enhanced the maize yield and decreased the soybean yield, and yield advantage was observed across all N application rates. Also, the gross profit was significantly affected by N application rates and intercropping, and the maximum increase in intercropped compared to that of monoculture appeared at the N2 treatment in 2018. Moreover, nutrient uptake was significantly affected by intercropping and N application rates; the N uptake of the intercropping system (on average of two years) was highest at the N2 application rate, which increased by 13.8% compared to that of monoculture system. CE and SE of grain yield were positive over the two‐year study and were both the main contributions. Furthermore, SE in N and P (only observed in 2017) uptake increased with the increase in N application rate, and SE was the main contribution to P uptake. Application of the additive partitioning method to intercropping may help to analyze the drivers of yield and nutrient advantage of intercropping and promote careful management of fertilizer application to improve nutrient use efficiency.

Effect of Maize (Zeal mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Intercropping on Yield and Root Development in Xinjiang, China

“…Research has shown that the yield of soybean is inhibited by maize, and the appropriate nitrogen application rate cannot alleviate the inhibitory effect on soybean [47]. It may be that soybean is not sensitive to nitrogen fertilizer, and maize responds quickly to nitrogen fertilizer, resulting in soybean being inhibited by maize, while maize shows yield advantage [48].…”

Overyielding is accounted for partly by plasticity and dissimilarity of crop root traits in maize/legume intercropping systems

“…Enhanced P acquisition is observed in faba bean/maize and chickpea/maize intercropping, due to positive complementarity effects (Li et al, 2018). In maize/soybean intercropping systems, selection effects based on P uptake significantly increase with nitrogen (N) application, and mainly drive the advantage of P uptake (Zhang, Meng, et al, 2021). Crop root plasticity in a changed environment may affect those processes.…”

Increased nodular P level induced by intercropping stimulated nodulation in soybean under phosphorus deficiency

“…Soybean ( Glycine max L.) widely is adopted to intercrop with other cereals in the world due to its superior ability in N 2 fixation 33 . The intercropping of soybean and maize is widely practiced as a promising option in China, due to its outstanding advantages in improvement of nutrient (N and P) use efficiency and yield 34 – 36 . Much work on improvement of P content in nodules under P deficiency today were mainly focused on soybean grown alone 37 – 39 , but little information is available about the P level in nodules altered by intercropping of soybean and maize.…”