2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YETI observations of the young transiting planet candidate CVSO 30 b

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although once the planetary hypothesis had no edge, Raetz et al (2016) and Johns-Krull et al (2016b) supported the presence of a disintegrating planet. The former monitored for three years and could not confirm the shrinking period reported in Yu et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although once the planetary hypothesis had no edge, Raetz et al (2016) and Johns-Krull et al (2016b) supported the presence of a disintegrating planet. The former monitored for three years and could not confirm the shrinking period reported in Yu et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al (2015), table B1 inRaetz et al (2016), and table 1 inOnitsuka et al (2017) to plot. Note that the data observed byvan Eyken et al (2012) were taken from table 1 inYu et al (2015) and only "complete" data inRaetz et al (2016) were employed.In the top panel, there is a sequence from data observed by vanEyken et al (2012) to dip-B. Then, assuming that they have the same source and dip-A has a different origin from dip-B, new ephemeris was derived using only dip-B in our data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nomenclature used by Yu et al (2015), the covered epochs are −690 and −689 4 . The ephemerides given by van Eyken et al (2012) show fading event times preceding those predicted by Raetz et al (2016) by about 2 ks. The formal (statistical) uncertainty of the fading event times is 0.6 ks in the case of Yu et al (2015) and 0.1 ks in the case of Raetz et al (2016).…”
Section: X-ray Photometrymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The ephemerides given by van Eyken et al (2012) show fading event times preceding those predicted by Raetz et al (2016) by about 2 ks. The formal (statistical) uncertainty of the fading event times is 0.6 ks in the case of Yu et al (2015) and 0.1 ks in the case of Raetz et al (2016). As the earliest photometric data published by van Eyken et al (2012) were obtained in Dec. 2009 (i.e., about six months after the XMM-Newton observations), all calculations of the fading event times require extrapolation.…”
Section: X-ray Photometrymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation