2018
DOI: 10.1002/naaq.10001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yellow Perch Sperm Motility, Cryopreservation, and Viability of Resulting Larvae and Juveniles

Abstract: The sperm of Yellow Perch Perca flavescens of two different age-classes, age 0 and 3, were cryopreserved using two different cryoprotectants (dimethylsulfoxide [DMSO] and methanol [MetOH]) with two freezing methods (pellet and vial). The viability and quality of the progenies obtained from fertilization with cryopreserved sperm were then examined. The motility of Walleye Sander vitreus sperm was examined following cryopreservation and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, with the aim of using heterologous cryopreserv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fish, no effect of sperm cryopreservation on offspring performance could be found in some species [24][25][26][27][28][29], while significant effects on several developmental traits were reported in others [30][31][32][33]. In the latter case, effects of cryopreservation on potential indicators of offspring fitness were sometimes negative [30,31] and sometimes positive [32], and sometimes results were mixed [33]. Most discrepancies among these studies may be explained by nonsufficient controls of potentially confounding parental and/or environmental effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fish, no effect of sperm cryopreservation on offspring performance could be found in some species [24][25][26][27][28][29], while significant effects on several developmental traits were reported in others [30][31][32][33]. In the latter case, effects of cryopreservation on potential indicators of offspring fitness were sometimes negative [30,31] and sometimes positive [32], and sometimes results were mixed [33]. Most discrepancies among these studies may be explained by nonsufficient controls of potentially confounding parental and/or environmental effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, effects of cryopreservation could have been confounded with effects of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in their study. In fish, no effect of sperm cryopreservation on offspring performance could be found in some species [24][25][26][27][28][29], while significant effects on several developmental traits were reported in others [30][31][32][33]. In the latter case, effects of cryopreservation on potential indicators of offspring fitness were sometimes negative [30,31] and sometimes positive [32], and sometimes results were mixed [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An immobilization solution (.33M sucrose solution) was added to preserve the milt ensuring all eggs were fertilized with the same milt. 33,34 Once egg ribbons were acquired from five different females, each female was kept for weight and length measurements. Each egg skein was fertilized with 50mL of the preserved milt solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Carneiro et al, (2012), los contenedores de carga seca (Dry Shipper) son más viables que los congeladores programables para la congelación de semen de cachama negra (Colossoma macropomum), ya que afectan menos la viabilidad y motilidad espermática. Miller et al (2018) han empleado un método de congelación particular, modificando el uso del hielo seco y empleándolo como molde para pellets. Para ello, los investigadores hicieron hoyos de 5 -7 mm de diámetro sobre el hielo seco y depositaron alícuotas de semen diluido en cada uno de ellos.…”
Section: Sistemas De Empaqueunclassified
“…Cuando la seminación se realiza con semen crioconservado, la relación semen:ovocitos deben ser aún mayor, dado que la congelación provoca una alta mortalidad de espermatozoides y disminución de la viabilidad celular . Para semen crioconservado se reporta una relación espermatozoides/ovocitos de 3.5x10 4 para Salminus brasiliensis (Weingartner et al, 2015); 1x10 5 para Salvelinus fontinalis, Oncorhynchus mykiss y Cyprinus carpius (Lahnsteiner et al, 2011;Öğretmen et al, 2014;Kutluyer et al, 2015); 1.6x10 5 para Sorubim cuspicaudus (Pardo-Carrasco et al, 2015); 2.5x10 5 para Colossoma macropomum (Maria et al, 2015); 2.7x10 5 para Salminus brasiliensis ; 3.2x10 5 para Prochilodus magdalenae (Atencio-García et al, 2015); 2.7x10 7 para Perca flavescens (Miller et al, 2018); 3x10 5 para Salmo trutta y Salvelinus fontinalis (Nynca et al, 2014(Nynca et al, , 2015b; 5x10 4 para Thymallus thymallus (Horváth et al, 2015); 5x10 4 -4x10 5 para Esox lucius (Irena et al, 2020); 5x10 4 -5x10 5 para Perca fluviatilis (Judycka et al, 2019); 5x10 5 para Hucho hucho (Nynca, 2015c); 5,15×10 5 para Piaractus mesopotamicus (Galo et al, 2019); 6x10 6 para trucha arco iris (Ciereszko et al, 2014); 7×10 4 para Prochilodus lineatus ; 7.5 ×10 4 para Brycon amazonicus (Velasco-Santamaría et al, 2006).…”
Section: Fertilidadunclassified