2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2013.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yeast surface display for the expression, purification and characterization of wild-type and B11 mutant glucose oxidases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained parental Aga2‐GOx and the three mutant Aga2‐GOx enzymes are denoted as WT, and M1, M2, and M3, respectively. It was previously reported (Blazic et al, ) that Aga2‐GOx fusion proteins produced using the surface display in S. cerevisiae exhibited a ~1.5‐fold decrease in catalytic turnover rate as compared with GOx lacking the Aga2 fusion domain. This prior work confirmed, however, that both an enhanced mutant and WT GOx were affected equally by fusion with Aga2, indicating that detection of an improved GOx variant as an Aga2‐fusion reflects the improvement in the properties of the enzyme and not an artifact of the Aga2 fusion domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained parental Aga2‐GOx and the three mutant Aga2‐GOx enzymes are denoted as WT, and M1, M2, and M3, respectively. It was previously reported (Blazic et al, ) that Aga2‐GOx fusion proteins produced using the surface display in S. cerevisiae exhibited a ~1.5‐fold decrease in catalytic turnover rate as compared with GOx lacking the Aga2 fusion domain. This prior work confirmed, however, that both an enhanced mutant and WT GOx were affected equally by fusion with Aga2, indicating that detection of an improved GOx variant as an Aga2‐fusion reflects the improvement in the properties of the enzyme and not an artifact of the Aga2 fusion domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We characterized the differences in thermal stability and glycosylation profiles of the mutant enzymes to account for their ability to outperform the WT under the assay conditions. Previously, a mutant Aga2‐GOx called B11 was purified and characterized (Blazic et al, ) with k cat = 80 s −1 , K M = 16 mM, and catalytic efficiency = 5.0. Our Aga2‐GOx mutant M1 reported here, by comparison, exhibits k cat = 136.1 s −1 , K M = 10.68 mM, and catalytic efficiency = 12.74.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were performed with Escherichia coli DH5α strain for transformation, kindly donated by Fraunhofer IME, Germany [19]. The exogenous recombinant DNA taken in experimental working was a chiA_pUC57 plasmid, which was purchased from Gene Script (#SD1176).…”
Section: Strains and Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Aga2-based yeast display systems, the cells typically are grown initially in glucose-or raffinose-containing medium to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 2-5 units, then shifted to galactose-supplemented medium for an additional 48-72 h of cultivation (Puthenveetil et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2011;Han et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011;Dang et al, 2012, Blazic et al, 2013. Alternatively, Andreu & Del Olmo (2013) demonstrated that a long (48-to72-h) incubation period with galactose was not required to achieve good display efficiency.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, 6-8 h of incubation was suitable for good levels of display efficiency. Blazic et al (2013) reported that a 12-h incubation in galactose was appropriate for optimizing display efficiency. These reports also showed that cell-surface display efficiency was dependent on the anchor protein and target protein/peptide.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%