Protoplasts 1983 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-6776-4_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yeast Strain Improvement by Protoplast Fusion and Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distantly related species are more prone to show this effect than closely related species (Morgan, 1983). Generally, protoplast fusion experiments result in hybrids containing the full genome of one parent, with a (few) extra chromosome(s) of the second parent (Yamazaki & Nonomura, 1994; Kavanagh & Whittaker, 1996).…”
Section: Natural and Artificial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distantly related species are more prone to show this effect than closely related species (Morgan, 1983). Generally, protoplast fusion experiments result in hybrids containing the full genome of one parent, with a (few) extra chromosome(s) of the second parent (Yamazaki & Nonomura, 1994; Kavanagh & Whittaker, 1996).…”
Section: Natural and Artificial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important disadvantage of using protoplast fusion as a strain improvement strategy is that many of the hybrids are mitotically unstable and chromosomal loss (resulting in aneuploidy) or dissociation into the parental strains often occurs (Pina et al, 1986;Attfield & Bell, 2003). Distantly related species are more prone to show this effect than closely related species (Morgan, 1983). containing the full genome of one parent, with a (few) extra chromosome(s) of the second parent (Yamazaki & Nonomura, 1994;Kavanagh & Whittaker, 1996).…”
Section: Protoplast Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%