The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yearly performance of the photovoltaic active cooling system using the thermoelectric generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these criteria, a PCM RT-25 [22], [23] are selected with thermal characteristics as shown in TABLE 1. The PCM container construction varied between four types of construction cavity volume (CV), Cavity Finned (CF), Cavity CHannel (CCH), and Cavity CaPsules (CCP) as shown in Table 2 c. Simple TEG products model with dimention of 40mmx 40mm x3.5mm [20].…”
Section: Mathematical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on these criteria, a PCM RT-25 [22], [23] are selected with thermal characteristics as shown in TABLE 1. The PCM container construction varied between four types of construction cavity volume (CV), Cavity Finned (CF), Cavity CHannel (CCH), and Cavity CaPsules (CCP) as shown in Table 2 c. Simple TEG products model with dimention of 40mmx 40mm x3.5mm [20].…”
Section: Mathematical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a. Flat plate collector glass cover and silicon photovoltaic cell impeded in aluminum plate frame [20].…”
Section: Mathematical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test was done through simulation providing similar standard conditions and they concluded around 6 % of increase in efficiency than the stand-alone PV panel. Furthermore, Metwally et al [19] developed a hybrid PV/TEG model and built an active cooling system which resulted in an increase in efficiency and power generation by 4 % -20 %. By evaluating the literature, it was analyzed that the hybrid PV/TEG has higher efficiency and better power production potential than the stand-alone PV and the efficiency of the hybrid system can be improved by adapting suitable configurations and cooling strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%