2014
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2014.2313371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yaw Estimation Using Cylindrical and Ellipsoidal Face Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be further divided into 2 categories coarsely, i.e. geometry distribution based methods [4] [39][40][41][42][43] and 3D facial model [5][6][7][8][9][10] [44][45][46][47][48][49] based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They can be further divided into 2 categories coarsely, i.e. geometry distribution based methods [4] [39][40][41][42][43] and 3D facial model [5][6][7][8][9][10] [44][45][46][47][48][49] based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batista [10] and Ji and Hu [40] developed an ellipse model on the face region based on the eye locations and estimate head pose angles by finding the relationship between the head pose angles and these ellipse parameters. Similarly, Yao et al [41] and Narayanan et al [42] also adopted an ellipsecircle model to estimate the head pose. Nikolaidis et al [43] distorted the isosceles triangle formed by the two eyes and the mouth to estimate the head yaw angle.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, this method requires a set of sequential frames and cannot be applied to single images. (Narayanan et al, 2014) studied yaw estimation using cylindrical and ellipsoidal face models. Their study on ellipsoidal framework provides MAE between 4 • and 8 • outperforming manifold-based approaches on FacePix dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, all of the feature points need to be visible, which makes these methods very sensitive to occlusion. Methods that use only the center of the head and face boundaries are more robust, more invariant to facial expressions and support a larger breadth of head orientations [4]. A different approach working with facial landmarks was proposed by Zhu et al [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%