2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-9781(01)00339-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Y-receptor affinity modulation by the design of pancreatic polypeptide/neuropeptide Y chimera led to Y5-receptor ligands with picomolar affinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All three radioligands bind to the Y 5 receptor subtype, although with different affinities (Michel et al, 1998;Dumont et al, 2004a (Cabrele et al, 2001); and nonpeptide Y 5 antagonists, such as CGP71683A (Criscione et al, 1998), JCF109 (Feletou et al, 1999), CP732925 (Elliott et al, 2003), and CP760542 and CP781214 (Yannielli et al, 2004). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All three radioligands bind to the Y 5 receptor subtype, although with different affinities (Michel et al, 1998;Dumont et al, 2004a (Cabrele et al, 2001); and nonpeptide Y 5 antagonists, such as CGP71683A (Criscione et al, 1998), JCF109 (Feletou et al, 1999), CP732925 (Elliott et al, 2003), and CP760542 and CP781214 (Yannielli et al, 2004). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Leu 31 Pro 34 -substituted analogs of NPY and PYY are also potent agonists on the Y 4 subtype (Gehlert et al, 1996). This receptor subtype can be activated by PYY and NPY, but with much lower potencies than the PPs (Lundell et al, 1995 , and hPP display potent agonist activities, whereas NPY(13-36), PYY(13-36), rPP, and GR231118 are much less active (Michel et al, 1998;Dumont et al, 2004a (Cabrele et al, 2001). In addition, various nonpeptide Y 5 antagonists have been characterized including CGP71683A (Criscione et al, 1998), JCF109 (Feletou et al, 1999), CP732925 (Elliott et al, 2003), and CP760542 and CP781214 (Yannielli et al, 2004 (Dumont et al, 1998) and the finding that BIBO3304 (Y 1 antagonist) and CGP71683A (Y 5 antagonist) were able to compete for 75 and 25% of specific ,Pro 34 ]hPYY binding, respectively (Dumont et al, 2000a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table II and Fig. 1 (50). The PP/NPY chimeras were modified by the introduction of the Ala-Aib dipeptide at positions 31-32.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This helicity could reduce sidechain mobility and availability, and then also the potential for low-affinity binding. The 19–23 tract of Y peptides contributes to specific binding [9], structuring [28] and receptor selectivity [8], but the difference between hNPY and hPYY or pPYY is only in the conservative switch of A and S at 22–23, and the following heptads are identical (Table 4). The 24–30 sector, LRHY[I,L]NL, differs only at position 28, and conservatively, for hNPY and hPYY or pPYY (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%