2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.162158799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Y genetic data support the Neolithic demic diffusion model

Abstract: There still is no general agreement on the origins of the European gene pool, even though Europe has been more thoroughly investigated than any other continent. In particular, there is continuing controversy about the relative contributions of European Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers and of migrant Near Eastern Neolithic farmers, who brought agriculture to Europe. Here, we apply a statistical framework that we have developed to obtain direct estimates of the contribution of these two groups at the time they met.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
197
4
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
197
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the genetic make-up of the Neolithic Basques is likely to mirror the general genetic signature of Neolithic populations in Europe. [17][18][19][20][21][22] Although the prevalence of the À13910T allele in the modern Basque population reaches 66%, 2 and the selection coefficient for lactase persistence has been shown to be relatively high in the Iberian Peninsula, 23 the processes that shaped this process are controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the genetic make-up of the Neolithic Basques is likely to mirror the general genetic signature of Neolithic populations in Europe. [17][18][19][20][21][22] Although the prevalence of the À13910T allele in the modern Basque population reaches 66%, 2 and the selection coefficient for lactase persistence has been shown to be relatively high in the Iberian Peninsula, 23 the processes that shaped this process are controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a mosaic model of biological and cultural change also helps reconcile the conflicting results often obtained from analyses of modern DNA (e.g. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]) and from archaeological studies (e.g. [4,26]), whereby studies suggest either demic or cultural diffusion as being the principal basis for change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contrasting demographic models are often referred to as the cultural diffusion and demic diffusion models, respectively [2,3]. Archaeological studies of Mesolithic and Neolithic sites [4] and analyses of modern European genetic variation [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have yielded diverse and often conflicting conclusions regarding this process. Recent ancient DNA studies have also provided inconsistent results regarding the biological relationship between Mesolithic and Neolithic populations [13 -19], suggesting that the demographic transition was not uniform across Europe but rather represents a mosaic of population replacement, admixture and adoption of farming practices by indigenous populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several Y chromosome studies supported the Neolithic demic diffusion model [17,23,24], while most mtDNA and some Y chromosomal studies have proposed a continuity of Upper Palaeolithic lineages [20,21,25,26]. The contrasting mtDNA and Y chromosomal evidence has been explained by differences in evolutionary scenarios, such as sex-biased migration [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%