Genetic variation in humans is sometimes described as being discontinuous among continents or among groups of individuals, and by some this has been interpreted as genetic support for "races." A recent study in which >350 microsatellites were studied in a global sample of humans showed that they could be grouped according to their continental origin, and this was widely interpreted as evidence for a discrete distribution of human genetic diversity. Here, we investigate how study design can influence such conclusions. Our results show that when individuals are sampled homogeneously from around the globe, the pattern seen is one of gradients of allele frequencies that extend over the entire world, rather than discrete clusters. Therefore, there is no reason to assume that major genetic discontinuities exist between different continents or "races."[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The following individuals kindly provided reagents, samples, or unpublished information as indicated in the paper: L.B. Jorde.]Early studies on human diversity showed that most genetic diversity was found between individuals rather than between populations or continents (e.g., Boyd 1950;Lewontin 1972) and that variation in human diversity is best described by geographic clines (Livingstone 1962;Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994). In spite of this, many recent studies using DNA polymorphisms have suggested that human genetic diversity is organized in continental clades (Cavalli-Sforza et al.