The unstable A form of 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-acetyl-fl-Dribofuranose, C13H1809 (m.p. = 330-331 K), crystallizes in the monoclinic system, a = 12.649 (2), b = 5.582 (2), c = 11.078(2) A,/3 = 97.92(1) °, space group P2~, Z = 2, D e = 1.364 Mg m -3. Final R = 0.045 for 1142 reflexions. To shed light on the spontaneous and irreversible transition of form A into * Dedicated to Professor Geza Schay (first director of CRIC) on his 80th birthday. the stable orthorhombic form B (m.p. 358 K) the present structure determination of A is compared with that of B reported by James & Stevens [Cryst. Struct. Commun. (1973), 2, 609-612] and Poppleton ]Acta Cryst. (1976), B32, 2702-2705]. Neither the bonding of the molecules nor the puckering of the furanose rings reveals significant differences. However, two of the four acetyl moieties exhibit torsional parameters [C(4)
IntroductionThe structural dimorphism of 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-acetylfl-D-ribofuranose (I) was discovered when Zinner (1950) found that the title compound, obtained by direct acetylation of D-ribose, showed a considerably higher melting point (355 K) than had been found by Howard, Lythgoe & Todd (1947) and Bredereck & Hoepfner (1948) (331 and 329 K, respectively). Davoll, Brown & Visser (1952) also prepared crystals which melted in the range 329-331 K, but repetition of the procedure described by Bredereck & Hoepfner (1948) yielded a sample melting at 358 K. The identical molecular structure of the higher-melting crystals (hereafter B) with that of the lower-melting product (hereafter A) was proved by preparative methods. When crystals of A were exposed to the air in a laboratory inoculated with B their melting points rose to 358 K while the crystals rapidly became opaque and A could not be prepared thereafter. Their structural dimorphism was suggested by Farrar (1952) who pointed out that both forms exhibit the same specific rotation in chloroform. Patterson & Groshens (1954), who determined the lattice parameters and space group of both crystals (A: monoclinic P2~, Z = 2, B: orthorhombic P2~2121, Z = 4), corroborated Farrar's conclusions. They also observed rapid and irreversible phase transformations of A into B catalysed by the presence of B crystals. Since then, no comparative structural studies of A and B have been reported, presumably because of fruitless attempts to prepare the unstable A (Poppleton, 1976). Accordingly, the crystal structure of B could only be determined to date (James & Stevens, 1973;Poppleton, 1976).
IAcO OAcRecently, whilst preparing ribofuranosyl derivatives, we have synthesized the title compound and obtained crystals which melt at 331 K. Its optical rotation in chloroform was identical to that of the higher melting B. Since we have invariably grown A in several experiments it seemed worthwhile to determine its crystal structure by X-ray diffraction and compare it with that of B.
ExperimentalThe title compound was prepared according to Guthrie & Smith (1968). Both base-and acid-catalysed acetylation gave the same product; colourless, ...